Yes. For all intents and purposes we're going to talk about Fi and Fe as if they were real persons, in the dominant state, and try to lightly describe the ways other functions work with Fe and Fi. And yes on your second question (LOL I WROTE ALL THIS CRAP BELOW AND IT'S NOT NECESSARY IDC I WROTE IT IT STAYS).Is Fi = personal moral value, what you intensely feel no matter how many others do, you do what /you/ are comfortable with and what /you/ personally think is right and what you identify with, no matter what
Fe = Objective values, one that the majority of society finds acceptable, values/morals are malleable depending on the majority opinion?
So Fi morals are much harder to shift/change than Fe because Fe has the potential to change if it finds everyone is against it?
or am I completely wrong in that?
REALLY BECAUSE I totally got INTP vibes but whatever. Anyway, will after I do Hunter's request.pretty sure i'm enfp at this point, Trap_Wolf wanna do an essay of me as well?
i mean i can find info myself as well but you seem pretty excited about sharing this stuff
OOOooo I see, thank you.Yes. For all intents and purposes we're going to talk about Fi and Fe as if they were real persons, in the dominant state, and try to lightly describe the ways other functions work with Fe and Fi. And yes on your second question (LOL I WROTE ALL THIS CRAP BELOW AND IT'S NOT NECESSARY IDC I WROTE IT IT STAYS).
Fi is about personal values. It's partner function as Te. We could say that Introverted Feeling is individualistic. It's moral code is more likely to be formed introspectively rather than extrospectively. They seek to find harmony in the world through their rigid moral code. Fi can have the strongest self-moral codes of all. It sees the world as black and white under an extremely rigid evaluation of value and desires. They can act brash and dictatorial if anyone does not fit into their selective value system. If a belief/action conflicts with one of their values then they will reject/refuse the aforementioned. This function is more likely to mull over life-changing events because they don't want to make the wrong choice with the information they have (Te) and before they know it the opportunity may be gone. Fi wants to seek meaning in life and find something higher than themselves they can believe in. When giving support to people important to them a Fi is more likely to be able to effectively do so if both the people and Fi have had shared experiences, otherwise they are perceived as aloof or uncaring. It may not respond because it does not know how to. A Fi is more likely to be able to give you what you need rather than what you want*.
Fe is about objective values. It's partner function is Ti. We could say that Extroverted Feeling is collective. In that, it sees values as real, tangible things and not abstract concepts. All moral codes are as real as the law of gravity. Highly sensitive to social roles and hierarchies, they want to understand all values as true. Fe seeks out to understand a multitude of moral codes extrospectively. It seeks to achieve harmony with a myriad of values and desires. Fe can have the weakest of self-moral codes because they ascribe to many moral codes and may selectively choose one based on the situation and what remains consistent (Ti). They can seem spineless or placid because they just go too along with the flow. They want to make considerations for everyone involved and to make everyone happy. This function is more likely to make quick decisions about life-changing events because there are external values that reflect that path positively, but sometimes what's being told for them isn't the best for them. When giving support to people important to them a Fe has keen insight on a other people's feelings and can easily be empathetic to anyone, but this can be seen as being disingenuous. They want to respond quickly because they sincerely care for your well-being at all times. A Fe is likely to be able to give you what you want rather than what you need*.
*these sentences are subjective in the sense that one can have precedence over another depending the situation. TAKE IT AS YOU WILL.
REALLY BECAUSE I totally got INTP vibes but whatever. Anyway, will after I do Hunter's request.
well this is intriguing, so if you don't mind, once you get to me, could you explain why you think this as well?REALLY BECAUSE I totally got INTP vibes but whatever.
Obviously the cool people right here ^-^.I know I'm crazy but here's a list of what people said they typed as in this thread so you can see if you can notice any patterns and similarities between groups of people if you want. Of course the odd person could be mistyped so isn't 100% accurate.
INTP - Psycho(?), Swift_Siren, Nottykitten, Timdood3, Ooglie101, Fruit, Hunter, Wimali
Pfft INFJ master race am I right Ansoro2112 <3Obviously the cool people right here ^-^.
This is wrong, I have no personalityINFP - Toiletprincess, Jayfeather, Chips, Naoh, Jivvi(?), superhalo6,
This isn't the complete full-lowdown I would like to do but I've been thinking about a certain portion for the past few days so consider the an introduction to Ne versus Ni.OOOooo I see, thank you.
ALSO I KNOW YOU'RE SUPER BUSY WITH THE INTP THING BUT I DON'T SUPPOSE IF YOU HAVE THE SPARE TIME YOU COULD EXPLAIN INTROVERTED INTUITION VS EXTROVERTED INTUITION COULD YOU PLEASE, WOULD BE SUPER GRATEFUL <3
It depends how your functions stack. I present them usually in terms of just as dominant functions and leaning towards just explaining them as dominant functions because it's a way to get a better foothold. Ne-Fi vesus Ne-Ti ((versus Fi-Ne versus Ti-Ne)) is different from one another just like Ni-Te, Ni-Fe, Te-Ni, Fe-Ni. Dominant and inferior functions are a little easier to explain by themselves than auxiliary and tertiary functions.Then I must be an Introvert powered by extrovert intuition... Although this reads far more like optimistic vs pessimistic view.
This particular scenario seems weird to me... Are you sure you didn't mix it up?
Probably I am confusing something.
lol that's actually pretty funny because it reflects a conversation I had earlier. Me and hip were literally talking about immortality and he was like "oh i could become a god and i could see and know everything, i'd love to be immortal" and i was like "but eventually the universe will be destroyed and you'll have learnt/seen everything and you won't be able to do anything with all that knowledge and you'll be alone, forever, in a void of nothingness, trapped with your thoughts and unable to do anything." Ni vs Ne right there I guess, since I identify with INFJ and he identifies with INFP.In a more simple way: if you asked Ne what would they do if they were immortal they would jot down all the things they could do, if not everything. If you asked Ni what would they do if they were immortal, they would take it waay far and think about the end of the universe, maybe even farther. Rudimentary explaination tho
I can't talk about inferior Ne and Ni without talking about their dominants: Si and Se.EDIT: How would the likely perception of immortality differ for someone with, say, Ne inferior or Ni inferior? Would they still lean more on the Ne side of viewing it if they have it inferior for example?