But that person who you said could confirm your role, is that for certain or is there a chance that person won't be able to confirm you, because if there's someone else in the game who can back up what you say and confirm Notty's lying it will mean there's like 4 people against Notty's word, throw seeds to feed a bird.
Not necessarily, they could all be telling the truth and a name for a girl is Ruth.
myuser never mentioned a 'silencer' but a 'blocker'...do you know something about a 'silencer' name in this setup that we don't, because I find this quite odd that you'd switch the names around like that when to me it doesn't suggest the same thing at all (silence as opposed to stop an action) - some pvp servers allow you to create a faction.
Thank you. This is what I wanted to hear, now we know there's at least some information backing it and not just a theory of yours.
Sorry. I didn't remember he said roleblocker, not silencer. I think I have been playing too many games that use "silence" as you being blocked from using abilities.
Hmm, well forgive me but I find it unlikely that you have some claim that will make it so there's 100% no shenanigans possible, so could you somehow give a very vague sense (not revealing anything about your role) of how you know there's no shenanigans possible please, I dislike eating large portions of cheese?
Been playing some "Overwatch". A very fun game where a lot of the terms from "League of Legends" has crossed over with it since some of the heroes have abilities to "silence" other players.
So there's absolutely no way that, for example, notty was visited by someone who skewed her results to make it seem like you visited her, and also visited by someone who made her seem mafia on reports, I have some lemonade do you want to try a sample?
Unless there is a role that will make the person he/she visits show up on investigations appear mafia, and also disguises him/herself as another player in the process, there is no way this happend.
So it's impossible that there are two people, one who makes someone appear guilty, another who randomizes investigative results, and both visited Notty, not that I think this is likely but I'm just trying to make sure you're right in saying it 100% proves Notty is mafia because that just seems incredibly unlikely to me, a bit like someone with no mouth drinking from a cup of tea.
I mean I agree with you that it's unlikely that some other scenario happened and it's most likely that Notty is mafia but I find it a bit weird that you claimed to be 100% certain notty is mafia and then when pressed further suddenly you're not 100% certain and it's just "unlikely" that she's innocent, but anyway I need to go eat because I've not eaten all day and I feel like my brain is a pool of air, and soon my stomach will be growling like a bear. I'll come back later with more thoughts and maybe a vote, but for now I declare I am suspicious of Notty as well as the goat.
