let's not explode [day 5 - GAME OVER (MAFIA WIN)]

[Enderfive]

This day has managed to actually make me ask what the fuck is going on.

We've gone from people shitvoting each other, to other people try to create an argument for voting from said shitvoting, in the end only creating ANOTHER cycle of shitvoting in the process. If the mafia are trying to enact a plan here its NOT working. >.>

how is what we're doing now shitvoting? weak reasoning is still reasoning

also can we please not do the not voting thing in votecounts, i keep confusing it for abstaining list for a moment

 

[Jivvi]

we're long past page 5 now:
no ratings
no shitposts

please keep arguments sane this is a no-circlejerk zone

 

[Mastersten]

Oh just noticed that I'm still on kalliee
#unvote

 

[Enderfive]

we're long past page 5 now:
no ratings
no shitposts

please keep arguments sane this is a no-circlejerk zone

i hope you realise this is impossible to achieve, even the best and least shitposty games have had circlejerks and insane arguments

 

[Jivvi]

i hope you realise this is impossible to achieve, even the best and least shitposty games have had circlejerks and insane arguments

yes but try and not to do much of that cause ill cut you from the game bitch try me youll see

 

[Hunter]

Kalliee - Mastersten (2/8)

mastersten confirmed mayor

 

[Jivvi]

mastersten confirmed mayor

this is an error; doublevoting is done by saying 'doublevote'.

 

[Samlen]

Votecount - The one where it is 100000% correct guaranteed[sup]TM[/sup] I swear
Mulbery - Aqua (1/8)
Aqua - Ooglie Oak (2/8)
Ltin - Hunter Notty (2/8)
Nolynch - Mario (1/8)
Not Voting - Caffeinated Mulbery Infected Jolt Kalliee Ender Runemen Ltin Mastersten (9/15)
15 living so 8 to no-ylnch or lynch

 

[Nottykitten]

8 to no-ylnch

Not sure you know the definition of "100000% correct guaranteed". <3

 

[Hunter]

tbh the mayor should just out themselves since their role is useless otherwise

 

[Nottykitten]

tbh the mayor should just out themselves since their role is useless otherwise

The litteral only thing that would do, is lower the pool of possible civilians for the Mafia. Which would benefit them while we gain nothing.

 

[Enderfive]

mayor should only claim if they're being lynched

 

[Hunter]

The litteral only thing that would do, is lower the pool of possible civilians for the Mafia. Which would benefit them while we gain nothing.

actually it'd give us a clear, maf wouldn't be able to cc, and we'd gain an extra vote for the rest of the game as it's doubtful maf would kill them off nor would town lynch them

 

[Enderfive]

doubtful maf would kill them off

it is always in mafia's best interests to off confirmed innocents, even if they don't do it then it still lowers the pool for possible civilians or even useful pr's

mayor should claim when he's being lynched, but at this point having one confirmed innocent gives us jack shit

later in the game would be more beneficial

 

[Hunter]

the cop dude wouldn't waste a night investigating them, same for doc saving, and since the mayor can't visit anyone nor would there be reason to visit them if they claimed, they'd be safe from the gadget's shenanigans.

 

[Hunter]

the mayor's power isn't oneshot iirc so they'd work better for us as a celebrity-type role anyway

there's absolutely no point for them to remain unclaimed

 

[Nottykitten]

the cop dude wouldn't waste a night investigating them, same for doc saving, and since the mayor can't visit anyone nor would there be reason to visit them if they claimed, they'd be safe from the gadget's shenanigans.

Isn't the entire point to hope the gadget hits the mayor?

 

[Ltin]

there's absolutely no point for them to remain unclaimed

Yes there is. Every claimed role makes the mafia's job easier.

 

[Hunter]

Yes there is. Every claimed role makes the mafia's job easier.

thank you, that was helpful and not vague at all

pros/cons would be nice, with pros including everything i've listed so far

 

[Nottykitten]

thank you, that was helpful and not vague at all

pros/cons would be nice, with pros including everything i've listed so far

Pros:
The don't kill the mayor.

Cons:
They dont. Kill. The Mayor.

Instead they kill the doctor/cop/civilians, and use their gadged on doctor/cop/civilians. Which would greatly increase their odds of winning. I'd rather have them have a chance of hitting the Mayor with their stuff.

 

[Ltin]

thank you, that was helpful and not vague at all

pros/cons would be nice, with pros including everything i've listed so far

How is it vague? What part of "excessive claiming hurts the town" wasn't clear?

 

[Hunter]

Isn't the entire point to hope the gadget hits the mayor?

actually this would avoid that happening plus the mayor can't visit anyone so that's not right

you likely meant the gadget hitting the doctor, as they visit two people per night and are visited by the nurse every night

 

[Enderfive]

actually this would avoid that happening plus the mayor can't visit anyone so that's not right

you likely meant the gadget hitting the doctor, as they visit two people per night and are visited by the nurse every night

what notty says is that if they hit the mayor then that's good for us

 

[Hunter]

what notty says is that if they hit the mayor then that's good for us

and if they don't hit the mayor we get a bonus townie vote the entirety of the game so that is also good for us

dunno if they'd waste a kill to get rid of confirmed inno mayor dude, I personally doubt it, but if they do it's still a waste

major benefit is no one, including town prs, would waste an action on the guy, preventing him from being nuked by gadget visit history shenanigans plus it'd be a shame if doc/cop wasted an investigation/save on said mayor

 

[Hunter]

what notty says is that if they hit the mayor then that's good for us

oh you mean with the gadget
imo it's really not worth it to throw away [everything listed] in the hope that maf fucks up and bombs the mayor. that's like less than a ten percent chance if they go random. gosh.