I'll retract my abstain vote and vote a no lynch instead. I honestly don't think that we absolutely "really urgently" need to vote for someone. Yes, the mafia can kill one of us, and I may be just making a beginners mistake, but we can't vote a random person because we have nobody to vote and there's no evidence. I can understand why, and why we need to hit a mafia member, but you can't do everything in one round, especially if nothing's suspicious. I feel it'd be fine to no lynch, but of course, it might just be a beginner mistake from me, which I don't honestly think it is.
(Not talking about you, Alpha, though I hate it when people use screwed up logic to make someone seem suspicious, but you used it on purpose to start up life in this thread again, which is good. Talking about the people who say "we need to vote someone, though, who?".)