MEDIEVAL MAFIA: INTRUSION [DAY 8]

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ansoro2112

Hottie
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
3,405
Reaction score
4,133
Next game should be less people xD

I don't really know what to say. I have no evidence to convince you its not ooglie or old.
All I can think of is that ansoro is Mafia. But I got no evidence to back this up =/. I just think his posts sound suspicious.

Vote Ansoro2112.

Can I know how they sound suspicious?

Also MarsKid, I'll be away for 6 days. Not sure if I will have internet. I'll try my best to keep playing though.
 

myusername22

A username.
Donor
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
858
Reaction score
937
So Natsu has left, and now Oak is dropping out as well.

I have no more reserves.

...

Yep.
I can't speak for everyone but I'd like to say this game has been a lot of fun so far and I think you are doing a great job hosting it. One of the main problems in my opinion is there was a different game going on when this one started that's holding up some of the regulars. It probably would've been wiser to host two smaller games at once rather than start a massive one during a different game. I'm not entirely sure the next game will need to be 20 but I kind of think the host for that game should just look at how many people sign up and adjust his game from there.
 

HypeBurst

Just Fabulous
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
450
Reaction score
1,165
Umm leave for two days and theres a massive shit-storm against ugh :c. Ok will better get to addressing some stuff.

That seems a bit early to me. It would have taken 13 to lynch him, if the day hadn't ended early. Seems.. planned. I would also like to point out that right after Hype voted for Hunter, grim voted for hunter. (Page 28)
Well technically I was the fouth person to vote for Hunter but I unvoted because of a post that Hunter made that seemed rather convincing. I decided to go with my gut and revote again. I had that vote for Hunter as the fourth person for around a day and that would have given Grimm ample time to see that I voted for him and vote with me, But guess what, She didnt. She voted for Hunter to make the numbers 6 because she most likely saw that he was going to get lynched anyway. Someone having 3 votes out of 13 is extremely early to start thinking that the lynch is inevitable. So no, She didnt vote right after me, she voted right after ooglie.

And was hard for him to keep on the thread, he saw hype vote, for hunter, a fellow mafia of grim's, and thought that he should as well if Hype was.
My name could be removed and replaced with any other of the four people who voted for Hunter before her so it seemed rather unfair that I'm the one singled out here.

(Myuser all stated a suspicion on hype and grim)
And? His suspicion for Grimm was completely unrelated to me. So even if he was right about one, that doesnt mean he's right about both.

I know, you're all going to say, "but Gmk was innocent! and Hype defended gmk earlier!" I myself thought this would proves hype's innocence, but what I have above, makes me suspicious of Hype :s

There's always the "what if he just did that to look innocent" which is what I'm starting to think. Notty's argument had been a bit faulty, so Hype could have just been trying to say that it really doesn't prove anything, whether he was innocent or not. (If this part is hard to understand, what I'm trying to say he was just pointing out that it would be a good idea to kill nit if he needed gmk dead to do anything, whether or not Hype was innocent or mafia)
You're suspicious of me because I was being logical and thinking things through when someone else was using, in your words, a "faulty" arguement? I dont get this logic at all. Doing something that will essentially help the town makes me mafia... sounds legit.

I was really expecting more from Hype after calling a F.O.S. on him. Then when he only gave me that.. seems like he knew GmK wasn't mafia, and thought, "oh good, if gmk dies, they will think I'm innocent.
I didnt respond much because that post was kinda well silly imo. Mainly because of the huge contradiction you made by saying that you believe GmK is innocent at the beginning but towards the end saying that he is your FoS because I defended him against a "faulty" arguement. I just... I just dont even. I didnt know Gmk wasnt mafia but I believed it because he killed off Nitasu, knowing that he was a mere third party role and wouldnt hurt the town in any way with him being lynched. The rest of the reasons why I thought he was town was in that post that you keep trying to say that Im mafia with.

Ok so I hope I got everything xXxFruitNinjaxXx , anything else you wish to atttack me on? hmm?
 

Fruit

Brrraaaaaiiiinnnnsss
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
979
Reaction score
1,509
Umm leave for two days and theres a massive shit-storm against ugh :c. Ok will better get to addressing some stuff.

That seems a bit early to me. It would have taken 13 to lynch him, if the day hadn't ended early. Seems.. planned. I would also like to point out that right after Hype voted for Hunter, grim voted for hunter. (Page 28)
Well technically I was the fouth person to vote for Hunter but I unvoted because of a post that Hunter made that seemed rather convincing. I decided to go with my gut and revote again. I had that vote for Hunter as the fourth person for around a day and that would have given Grimm ample time to see that I voted for him and vote with me, But guess what, She didnt. She voted for Hunter to make the numbers 6 because she most likely saw that he was going to get lynched anyway. Someone having 3 votes out of 13 is extremely early to start thinking that the lynch is inevitable. So no, She didnt vote right after me, she voted right after ooglie.

And was hard for him to keep on the thread, he saw hype vote, for hunter, a fellow mafia of grim's, and thought that he should as well if Hype was.
My name could be removed and replaced with any other of the four people who voted for Hunter before her so it seemed rather unfair that I'm the one singled out here.

(Myuser all stated a suspicion on hype and grim)
And? His suspicion for Grimm was completely unrelated to me. So even if he was right about one, that doesnt mean he's right about both.

I know, you're all going to say, "but Gmk was innocent! and Hype defended gmk earlier!" I myself thought this would proves hype's innocence, but what I have above, makes me suspicious of Hype :s

There's always the "what if he just did that to look innocent" which is what I'm starting to think. Notty's argument had been a bit faulty, so Hype could have just been trying to say that it really doesn't prove anything, whether he was innocent or not. (If this part is hard to understand, what I'm trying to say he was just pointing out that it would be a good idea to kill nit if he needed gmk dead to do anything, whether or not Hype was innocent or mafia)
You're suspicious of me because I was being logical and thinking things through when someone else was using, in your words, a "faulty" arguement? I dont get this logic at all. Doing something that will essentially help the town makes me mafia... sounds legit.

I was really expecting more from Hype after calling a F.O.S. on him. Then when he only gave me that.. seems like he knew GmK wasn't mafia, and thought, "oh good, if gmk dies, they will think I'm innocent.
I didnt respond much because that post was kinda well silly imo. Mainly because of the huge contradiction you made by saying that you believe GmK is innocent at the beginning but towards the end saying that he is your FoS because I defended him against a "faulty" arguement. I just... I just dont even. I didnt know Gmk wasnt mafia but I believed it because he killed off Nitasu, knowing that he was a mere third party role and wouldnt hurt the town in any way with him being lynched. The rest of the reasons why I thought he was town was in that post that you keep trying to say that Im mafia with.

Ok so I hope I got everything xXxFruitNinjaxXx , anything else you wish to atttack me on? hmm?


1) Didn't see that you had voted and revoted
2) On the list you were the one right before grim, and you had both posted on the same day. Actually, if you voted and revoted, grim still voted right after you, you can see it on the page.
3) I was just stating a previous suspicion on you (I saw it in a reply to myuser that i quoted from grim)
4) I was arguing with my previous logic here. That if gmk were innocent, I'd think you were innocent. However, with I've come to realize you could have just been taking the oppurtunity to defend an innocent, and it really doesn't prove much, because it could be a good mafia tactic to defend an innocent.
 

Brainless

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
5
Reaction score
12
MarsKid, I say you just post the roles, who knows if the "new people" will be active? If they are great If not… Then were back in this same situation of wasting time. Just post the roles and just lynch the in actives so we can have an active FUN game.
 

Jeercrul

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2012
Messages
343
Reaction score
502
This game has ground to a halt.
I generally feel that it was the continual replacement of roles that killed the game. So many people were kicked out of or left the game due to poor reasons. Seriously people, if you knew that you cannot handle the game at some point in time before signing up, then don't. It saves the host and the players a lot of trouble and at least it won't kill the joy of the game. Signing up means commitment. Don't quit halfway because you lost interest or simply because you don't know what else to do in the game.

Thank you Marskid for hosting this game though, it was great!
 

Ansoro2112

Hottie
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
3,405
Reaction score
4,133
I'm relaxing at tr beach and I read Marskid wants it end the game.

I think it should keep going. It's just all the replacements there has been that it's making this game hard or not enjoyable.

But I think there is still a lot I do.

Marskid, I highly doubt there's going to be people who would want to join as this point. No one wants to rad 50 pages to catch up.

My suggestion? Post Oaks and Natsus roles. And see if that helps in something, just dot waste your time looking for replacements.
 

Brainless

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
5
Reaction score
12
I agree with calling it off, it would get this boring game over with, we could start a new one with fewer players, about 15 maybe. Then hopefully those players will continue to be active. I've been on Mafia forums before and it seems like every time I join a site it gets like this… a huge game with barely anyone being active, then they continue the game and the Mafia part of the forum slowly dies. I agree with MarsKid, we call it quits BUT do a smaller game. If we do not then this game will be draaaaaaaaged out and really be a waste of our time.
 

Ansoro2112

Hottie
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
3,405
Reaction score
4,133
Or Marskid can reveal Oak's and Natsus's role as see if that helps in anything.

And if at the end we decide to start a new game then freaking sign up the players who will play till the end. And be freaking active.

Just pisses me off people who have been trying their best and at the end it's going to end thanks to people leaving.

Gurl, think twice before signing up to a game :m
 

Brainless

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
5
Reaction score
12
Agreed. Let's show the roles of all the 2. Also how about we look in the past couple days and see who HASN'T been posting and (unless they said they'd be gone for a couple days) how about they are automatically lynched?

MarsKid @ansoro2012
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top