Umm leave for two days and theres a massive shit-storm against ugh :c. Ok will better get to addressing some stuff.
That seems a bit early to me. It would have taken 13 to lynch him, if the day hadn't ended early. Seems.. planned. I would also like to point out that right after Hype voted for Hunter, grim voted for hunter. (Page 28)
Well technically I was the fouth person to vote for Hunter but I unvoted because of a post that Hunter made that seemed rather convincing. I decided to go with my gut and revote again. I had that vote for Hunter as the fourth person for around a day and that would have given Grimm ample time to see that I voted for him and vote with me, But guess what, She didnt. She voted for Hunter to make the numbers 6 because she most likely saw that he was going to get lynched anyway. Someone having 3 votes out of 13 is extremely early to start thinking that the lynch is inevitable. So no, She didnt vote right after me, she voted right after ooglie.
And was hard for him to keep on the thread, he saw hype vote, for hunter, a fellow mafia of grim's, and thought that he should as well if Hype was.
My name could be removed and replaced with any other of the four people who voted for Hunter before her so it seemed rather unfair that I'm the one singled out here.
(Myuser all stated a suspicion on hype and grim)
And? His suspicion for Grimm was completely unrelated to me. So even if he was right about one, that doesnt mean he's right about both.
I know, you're all going to say, "but Gmk was innocent! and Hype defended gmk earlier!" I myself thought this would proves hype's innocence, but what I have above, makes me suspicious of Hype :s
There's always the "what if he just did that to look innocent" which is what I'm starting to think. Notty's argument had been a bit faulty, so Hype could have just been trying to say that it really doesn't prove anything, whether he was innocent or not. (If this part is hard to understand, what I'm trying to say he was just pointing out that it would be a good idea to kill nit if he needed gmk dead to do anything, whether or not Hype was innocent or mafia)
You're suspicious of me because I was being logical and thinking things through when someone else was using, in your words, a "faulty" arguement? I dont get this logic at all. Doing something that will essentially help the town makes me mafia... sounds legit.
I was really expecting more from Hype after calling a F.O.S. on him. Then when he only gave me that.. seems like he knew GmK wasn't mafia, and thought, "oh good, if gmk dies, they will think I'm innocent.
I didnt respond much because that post was kinda well silly imo. Mainly because of the huge contradiction you made by saying that you believe GmK is innocent at the beginning but towards the end saying that he is your FoS because I defended him against a "faulty" arguement. I just... I just dont even. I didnt know Gmk wasnt mafia but I believed it because he killed off Nitasu, knowing that he was a mere third party role and wouldnt hurt the town in any way with him being lynched. The rest of the reasons why I thought he was town was in that post that you keep trying to say that Im mafia with.
Ok so I hope I got everything
xXxFruitNinjaxXx , anything else you wish to atttack me on? hmm?