Paste what you have copied :D

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jayfeather

Gay Magician
Donor
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
3,205
Reaction score
3,051
11:37 PM - Choclate: looool
11:37 PM - Jayfeatherswagswag: Except
11:37 PM - Jayfeatherswagswag: I almost got my leg chewed off
11:37 PM - Jayfeatherswagswag: I swear I could feel it too
11:37 PM - Choclate: i had one of those once
11:37 PM - Choclate: i was doing some walking dead thing
11:37 PM - Choclate: and
11:37 PM - Choclate: they were like nawing at my leg
11:38 PM - Choclate: AND I FELT IT
11:38 PM - Choclate: then i woke up
11:38 PM - Jayfeatherswagswag: I IKNOW
11:38 PM - Jayfeatherswagswag: ITS SO AWKWARD
11:38 PM - Jayfeatherswagswag: ITS LIEK
11:38 PM - Jayfeatherswagswag: WOULD YOU PLEASE STOP BREAKING THE LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE
11:38 PM - Choclate: IKR
11:38 PM - Choclate: I WOKE UP LIKE
11:38 PM - Jayfeatherswagswag: IS MY LEG STILL HERE
11:38 PM - Choclate: MY LEGS WERE DANCING OR SOMEHING
 

Mach9824

Destroyer of Worlds
Contributor
Joined
Nov 24, 2011
Messages
256
Reaction score
448
Immanuel Kant writes that “there are minds so sympathetically constituted that, without any motive of vanity or self-interest, they find a pleasure in spreading joy around them, and can take delight in the satisfaction of others so far as it is their own work. But I maintain that in such a case an action of this kind, however proper, however amiable it may be, has nevertheless no true moral worth,” (Bailey, p.64). Explain how he can make such a claim. Do you find this claim to be plausible? If so, why. If not, why not?






Oh great..... I thought I was done with that god damn essay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top