SCP - Secure, Contain, Mafia [GAME OVER]

[GmK]

Oy, conflicting messages all over!!

I'll ignore the Hunter thing for a moment (like I said, I'll let you play your game, but don't be such a hypocrite, kthx), and look at the way more interesting O5 situation.

This confirms - in my eyes - that one of them seems to have other motives.

I see two options:

1) The iggy theory being somewhat correct. This also explains the sudden vote on a potentially non-dangerous third party claim compared to voting the more dangerous survivor third party.

2) The fact what I quoted a bit ahead:

Well, to be honest:

Jivvi voted yes twice on the O5 targets, just for the fun of it? So far he hasn't explained any reasoning for those votes? Seems very careless for a town role
Jivvi used the shears on a cop claim, just for the fun of it?
Jivvi double-voted to get a person lynched, just for the fun of it? A person who was extremely far away from being actual scum, a lynch with the main argument "to find out more, even if it's likely a town person"

This can indicate that we might after all have Jivvi being some kind of baddie as well.

 

[chicken23456789]

Back! Well Road how many of these "points" or whatever you called them do you need to win because if it's a lot them you might well be beneficial to the town but if your going to win in two more kills then it would do well to lynch you now. Also I find it a bit suspicious that a 3rd party would claim, especially if your method of winning is dependent on the amount of player deaths. Not going to vote though until you say the amount of "points" you need left to win the game because as I said you might prove benefical to the town.

 

[GmK]

Oy, to add to Jivvi: This would mean Jivvi didn't actually vote on std for knowing he is maybe mafia?

Argh, ok this is confusing...

 

[GmK]

Back! Well Road how many of these "points" or whatever you called them do you need to win because if it's a lot them you might well be beneficial to the town but if your going to win in two more kills then it would do well to lynch you now. Also I find it a bit suspicious that a 3rd party would claim, especially if your method of winning is dependent on the amount of player deaths. Not going to vote though until you say the amount of "points" you need left to win the game because as I said you might prove benefical to the town.

1) Just a few posts earlier another third party claimed. Do you find him also suspicious?

2) Didn't he state clearly he doesn't know how many he needs?

3) What happened to your claim?

 

[Jolterino]

AHEM!

Lee_scar: One of us voted yes and one voted no. I voted yes after the deadline so it didn't count.

std: I voted yes on him. In my opinion he was lurking a lot in the game. Another thing, why is jolteon always picking the inactive(pretty inactive) players? .

Oh and by the way I think Jivvi is acting more suspicious than Oak right now. So I think jivvi voted No.

And having a third party out in the open is dangerous even if they are pretty neutral. That's why I'm going to

Vote The road to ruin

I didn't pick the 2nd night target. Also, inactive townies aren't worth much anyway. (Definitely not a hypocrite.)
What does the survivor do?

 

[GmK]

What does the survivor do?

He wins if alive at the end, no matter what other faction has succeeded (so if mafia wins and he is alive, he also wins, same way with town. This makes survivors incredibly unpredictable and dangerous to town, as they can easily help mafia win by helping in a game deciding vote)

 

[Hunter]

The way I see it, if road is telling the truth, then he's probably close to winning, which means everyone else loses soon
If he isn't telling the truth, he's still claiming to be a third party, which is a thing the mafia might do
While Ltin as survivor is inherently more dangerous, Road still claims to be a third party close to winning

 

[Alisha]

Vote Count: 'Alot' is NOT A WORD. IT IS DRIVING ME CRAZY.

Iggy234 - 1 - (GmK) [9 more]
Samlen - 1 - (Raxo2222) [9 more]
Jolteon42 - 1 - (Nottykitten) [9 more]
The road to ruin - 2 - Hunter27a1, iggy234 [8 more]

With 19 alive it'll take 10 for a lynch and 9 to no-lynch!

 

[GmK]

The way I see it, if road is telling the truth, then he's probably close to winning, which means everyone else loses soon
If he isn't telling the truth, he's still claiming to be a third party, which is a thing the mafia might do
While Ltin as survivor is inherently more dangerous, Road still claims to be a third party close to winning

Usually TP wins don't result in the game ending. Even though the TP "has won" the town can still win as well. So I personally don't give a damn how close road might be to winning since I find it more unlikely of him to swing anti-town due to mafia giving him more points.

(that is assuming the claim is correct)

 

[Jolterino]

vote The road to ruin

There's no bad situation to this lynch in my opinion.

 

[Notme]

Hmm I read these posts.

I think vote The road to ruin would be best option.

 

[Nottykitten]

How is there no bad situation to this Lynch? Road actually has motive to help the town while Ltin has none. If you want to lynch one of the survivors lynch Ltin not Road >.<

Meanwhile I'll wait till Jivvi replies with his responce about the stuff. Also I still want Iggy to say wether only Jivvi could see the fact there were 2 yes's and 1 no, or that everyone on the O5 knew what the votes were when the day started.

 

[GmK]

Have you all gone silly?

You vote a TP claim that is of no inherent danger to us, instead of:

- actual scumhunting
- wondering why the heck one O5 is lying and what their motive is
- going for a more "dangerous" survivor
- Even once do a sanity check on Hunters claim (that you all immediately believe, compared to roads claim, only because hunter attacked it? What happened to thinking by yourself?)

Now, yes, I am also doubtful of roads claim, but it's like the least best option to vote him off whilst there's so many other angles of attack. Let's at least give us a bit more time and not yet another CaffeinatedKitten thing!

 

[Hunter]

How is there no bad situation to this Lynch? Road actually has motive to help the town while Ltin has none. If you want to lynch one of the survivors lynch Ltin not Road >.<

Meanwhile I'll wait till Jivvi replies with his responce about the stuff. Also I still want Iggy to say wether only Jivvi could see the fact there were 2 yes's and 1 no, or that everyone on the O5 knew what the votes were when the day started.

jolteon could simply propose ltin as a target during night, solving that problem

 

[GmK]

jolteon could simply propose ltin as a target during night, solving that problem

Leaving us with two potential TP's dead an no step closer to finding scum? Splendid ^^

(Or maybe they're all scum and fakeclaiming, meaning this would actually be awesome)

 

[Jolterino]

Right now I just want to know if road to ruin wins with us or alone. (Although if he won alone he wouldn't say it.)

 

[Iggish]

How is there no bad situation to this Lynch? Road actually has motive to help the town while Ltin has none. If you want to lynch one of the survivors lynch Ltin not Road >.<

Meanwhile I'll wait till Jivvi replies with his responce about the stuff. Also I still want Iggy to say wether only Jivvi could see the fact there were 2 yes's and 1 no, or that everyone on the O5 knew what the votes were when the day started.

As far as I know all of us could see the vote but not the people that voted

 

[Nottykitten]

As far as I know all of us could see the vote but not the people that voted

So it is true that one person voted no?

Right now I just want to know if road to ruin wins with us or alone. (Although if he won alone he wouldn't say it.)

He claims he wins after a certain amount of people have died, so he wins alone. However I think as town we should focus on winning ourselves instead of making Third Parties lose, since lynching road doesn't really accomplish anything for us.

I do however like the idea of you proposing Ltin's name to the O5 council.

 

[Jolterino]

So it is true that one person voted no?


He claims he wins after a certain amount of people have died, so he wins alone. However I think as town we should focus on winning ourselves instead of making Third Parties lose, since lynching road doesn't really accomplish anything for us.

I do however like the idea of you proposing Ltin's name to the O5 council.

But if he wins we lose don't we?

 

[GmK]

But if he wins we lose don't we?

Not if he operates like any normal TP in our forum mafia games.

 

[Iggish]

So it is true that one person voted no?


He claims he wins after a certain amount of people have died, so he wins alone. However I think as town we should focus on winning ourselves instead of making Third Parties lose, since lynching road doesn't really accomplish anything for us.

I do however like the idea of you proposing Ltin's name to the O5 council.

Yeah,one person voted no. It doesn't matter who you think voted it but one fact we know. One person voted No.

 

[Iggish]

Anyway like this new avatar?

 

[Jolterino]

Not if he operates like any normal TP in our forum mafia games.

...but you just said he wins alone? Does that he wins and we continue playing?

 

[Hunter]

(Or maybe they're all scum and fakeclaiming, meaning this would actually be awesome)

^this is what I'm hoping for, and it seems very very likely, at least with Ltin
as a survivor has no motivation for actually claiming survivor afaik
as for road, the focus wasn't that he was fakeclaiming, more so that it didn't matter as he doesn't benefit the town

But if he wins we lose don't we?

yes, everyone else loses, but since that's disappointing the game will probably continue onwards for 2nd place

 

[GmK]

...but you just said he wins alone? Does that he wins and we continue playing?

Well we can't deep into the topic due to game PM blah blah, but usually a TP win means the game keeps going normally, with the town still having the task to eliminate all threats to the town.