Thanks for the answer JK, I'll let you know if you are Mafia or not tomorrow
Oh, and I forgot another thing I was going to add in terms of the actual question.
I did say the question felt like it was worded wrong and will come out with an undesirable effect. I didn't really know how to explain it at the time, but I've been able to recall why it felt strange to me.
I don't think you are going to get the right effect at all, and I'm certain it won't prove me being Mafia-affiliated or not, or say anything about the other 2 on that list. I am almost 80% certain it will come out as "False/Lie" due to various things that hasn't really been explained/possible hidden details in terms of the Lie Detector role.
Firstly, from your role claim:
I successfully cought both Endersteve and Timdood on their lies.
Night 1: Endersteve5. - Was lying when saying "yes" to the question "Are you town-sided"
Night 2: Timdood3. - Was lying when saying "totally not" to the question "Are you town-sided"
Meaning that Ender was Anti-Town and Tim is Town-Sided.
Both of these were from the question: "Are you town sided," which, for the most part, are extremely straightforward questions, and for the most part that question could be
legitimately answered, and thus could be manipulated i.e. Endersteve or a Mafia-sided role saying "Yes/No" to said question to perhaps cover up their true identity, or a townie just going along with it and being truthful.
This question however:
Question: "How many of the following people are Anti-town: JKangaroo, Prizyms, UltimateBudgie"
My answer: "Two or more"
Which would have been answered by me... can't exactly be answered
legitimately because I can't know if these other players (Priz/UB) are actually anti-town (originally it was asking for Mafia). Because I am not answering this legitimately (and I am saying from the standpoint as an un-aware townsperson/simple villager role), I'm not even sure it would be accepted by GmK as a viable question because the role relies on the person telling the truth or not, and so if I did not know, then it would almost unanimously result in a
lie.
Should it be accepted (both on its own, as well as being retorted but accepted) and results in a lie, it could lead to unneeded drama if you wanted to take advantage of that. (or if Lie-Detects were broadcasted during the night roundup, which it isn't in this case)
Alongside that, it doesn't exactly prove much information as it stands, especially if it results in a
lie.
Firstly, it could result in a lie if there WEREN'T 2 or more; but what if ONE of them were? If it results in a lie, it'll result in a strange scenario where it
could be truthful but due to the above scenario of the possibility of NOT KNOWING
john snow... it results in a lie and doesn't move us forward anywhere and possible drama.
If it is indeed
a lie (in the event that I didn't know their roles) but is accepted, as well as the result of the argument at the start of this paragraph where there is the possibility that ONE OF THEM could be anti-town, it could again cause some unneeded drama or lynching unless there is coordination with the cop to investigate one of them alongside this lie-detect.
Also why specifically
Me, UltimateBudgie, and Prizyms? It's a strange selection of players from out of the blue with no explanation, and it has me curious because again, there is no explanation for it. (And why me exactly. Though you did say that you chose me the night before, you didn't say
why, which is also curious).
I don't feel this plan of yours will actually work out unless something is changed.