You may not be doc. Although I suppose you have a point. We cant question myuser anymore, him being dead and all. You could easily be planning this.Third party doctor? Doubt it. What would be the point of them saving anybody?
I'm not agreeing because it's against you, I'm agreeing because your arguments don't quite add up in my mind, and because I still don't really believe in your being cleared.@Timdood3 as the supposed 'cop' (who suspiciously hasn't died despite having claimed very early in the game) I'd like to see you actually post something as opposed to merely rating 'agree' to anything that goes against me
The first two can be just as easily applied to storm. The third is...what even? And the last: why wouldn't he be killing as SK? And we concluded on a previous day that there probably wasn't an SK.EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ME
EVIDENCE AGAINST STORM
- The aforementioned PM intercepted by myusername.
- Going after scum in the tribunal
- Lack of quack
- Inn scum pattern
- 'Innocent' on cop report with me innocent - guaranteed third party
- Quickly changing the subject of arguments from an argument against his role claim to an argument against him as a player to finally appealing to the town's emotions by begging Digitalmez to hammer, as I 'begged' him to protect me in the inn.
- WIFOMing about 'more night kills'
Sorry, misphrased my response. I mean in the 'evidence' agasint storm, the same first two can be applied to you as well, and the rest the same.@Timdood3 The third one means there is no quack role in this game: that is to say, there is no mafia-sided doctor equivalent due to reasons stated earlier.
What other role would have a gender requirement?Sorry, misphrased my response. I mean in the 'evidence' agasint storm, the same first two can be applied to you as well, and the rest the same.
And just because your role has to do with gender doesn't clear you in any way shape or form.
Neither does being part of the tribunal.
whatYou're still not cleared. The pm interception showed you have a role which has something to do with males and females. Which to my eyes sounds like a role a third party would have.
It's a majority vote.I'd like to hear something from members of the tribunal: Does the vote to kill have to be unanimous? That's mostly curiosity; it doesn't really matter anyway as priz would likely see that he had no choice in the matter of shooting a mafia because if he didn't he'd be called out. (This assumes Priz is guilty)
That the message which you keep telling us cleared you, infact does not clear you at all.what
So only two of the three. Meaning if there is one mafia member in the tribunal, it can still kill mafia members. If the tribunal gets multiple mafia members in it, it would be incredibly easy for the mafia to start killing of the town.It's a majority vote.
Dating wasn't really a thing in Renaissance Italy as far as I'm aware. And GmK stated that there are no autowin roles such as fool or jester - your bachelor autowin condition fits that perfectly.That the message which you keep telling us cleared you, infact does not clear you at all.
For all we know, you could have the role of Bachelor. And you need to get a date with 2 female players to win the game. And your flirting isn't that good so you have a 50% chance of being rejected.
I mean "Nottykitten was female but your action did not work" litterally fits that. So as I said, that PM did not clear you and sounds more like a third party role.