The Bloody Masquerade Ball [GAME OVER]

Ltin

Member
Mafia Host
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
951
Reaction score
1,481
It's a fair bit hypocritical for you to say that - FMPOV he's confirmed as a malicious third party and you're harping on about a quixotic alternate reality where he isn't lying.
Well you see, FMPOV you're confirmed as a malicious third party and you're harping on about a quixotic alternate reality where he is lying.
 

Prizyms

あんたバカァ~!?
Mafia Host
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
2,899
As I myself investigated storm and he came up innocent (which happens for third parties as well) I am far more inclined to believe storm. And "Through further deduction"....what deduction would that be?
You're inclined to believe him because he came up as innocent in your investigation, which also happens for third party roles such as serial killer

Right, I have huge hopes for this town! >_>

Also @Ltin you're extremely scummy right now.
 

Prizyms

あんたバカァ~!?
Mafia Host
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
2,899
I will paraphrase what I said to Storm last night in the inn, as I'm not sure if I'm allowed to quote or not.

Me: 'Pretty sure this chat is now safe - please save me, Storm'

Storm: 'Missed me, was going to save Timdood but remembered I couldn't save the same person twice in a row so I saved Notty instead'

Me: 'Don't save Notty: third parties typically don't have town win conditions!'
 

Prizyms

あんたバカァ~!?
Mafia Host
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
2,899
Im always scummy. Its my playstyle (according to somebody, I dont remember who), or my lack of playstyle.
That's... not encouraging, nor is it a good thing.

I think priz is trying to play the "im more experienced than you so my opinion is right" card
Nope, I'm playing the 'I'm telling the truth and you're not' card to storm886.
 

Ltin

Member
Mafia Host
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
951
Reaction score
1,481
Lets see,
I see a few posts about a possible quack,
A post about how assasins are a second mafia,
More quack,
A post claiming to be cleared,
Myuser was stupid,
I could have claimed anything,
Your arguments suck,
Dont change the subject,
He did change the subject,
Target, not pointed out,
LAL,
Ill vote if we lynch,
Point out my flaws,
I can pick apart lies, storm cant,
He is lieing,
Dont be a hypocrite,
I didnt beg,
You belive hin because you're cop,
This is what happened in the inn,
Im telling the truth,
Iv put lots of evidence in front of you,
I have responded.




Nope, is see no evidence.
 

Prizyms

あんたバカァ~!?
Mafia Host
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
2,899
In bold and brackets are my responses to your 'counterargument'.

I see a few posts about a possible quack, (There cannot be a quack)
A post about how assasins are a second mafia, (Proven)
More quack, (Because seemingly the first post wasn't understood)
A post claiming to be cleared, (which I am)
Myuser was stupid, (which he was, sorry)
I could have claimed anything, (which I could have)
Your arguments suck, (which they do)
Dont change the subject, (which he did)
He did change the subject, (indeed)
Target, not pointed out, (did you even understand what I meant by this)
LAL, (which I am a firm advocate of)
Ill vote if we lynch, (which I want)
Point out my flaws, (go ahead, I'm still waiting)
I can pick apart lies, storm cant, (because I have no lies to have picked apart)
He is lieing, (which he is)
Dont be a hypocrite, (indeed, stop)
I didnt beg, (which I didn't, I asked nicely)
You belive hin because you're cop, (for the thousandth time, third parties show up as inno)
This is what happened in the inn, (which did happen)
Im telling the truth, (I am)
Iv put lots of evidence in front of you, (which you haven't, you've just spat out abridged versions of what I've said)
I have responded. (not really.)


TL;DR Ltin knows how to summarise things whilst leaving out important details at the same time.
 

Ltin

Member
Mafia Host
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
951
Reaction score
1,481
In bold and brackets are my responses to your 'counterargument'.
I wasnt arguing shit. I was summarizing your posts.
My counter counter argument will be unbolded in parentheses (where applicaple.)

I see a few posts about a possible quack, (There cannot be a quack)
A post about how assasins are a second mafia, (Proven)
More quack, (Because seemingly the first post wasn't understood) (no, it wasnt.)
A post claiming to be cleared, (which I am)(not)
Myuser was stupid, (which he was, sorry)
I could have claimed anything, (which I could have)
Your arguments suck, (which they do) (yours dont make any sense to me)
Dont change the subject, (which he did) (he responded to you)
He did change the subject, (indeed)(see above)
Target, not pointed out, (did you even understand what I meant by this)
LAL, (which I am a firm advocate of)
Ill vote if we lynch, (which I want)
Point out my flaws, (go ahead, I'm still waiting)
I can pick apart lies, storm cant, (because I have no lies to have picked apart) (unproven)
He is lieing, (which he is) (also unproven)
Dont be a hypocrite, (indeed, stop)
I didnt beg, (which I didn't, I asked nicely) (looked like begging to me)
You belive hin because you're cop, (for the thousandth time, third parties show up as inno)
This is what happened in the inn, (which did happen)
Im telling the truth, (I am) (unproven)
Iv put lots of evidence in front of you, (which you haven't, you've just spat out abridged versions of what I've said) (iv already discussed this)
I have responded. (not really.)
(you responded to storm, but never really pointed out his flaws in a way that makes them evidence.)

TL;DR Ltin knows how to summarise things whilst leaving out important details at the same time.
 

Prizyms

あんたバカァ~!?
Mafia Host
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
2,899
You built the straw man, not me.
Now, if you really believe that you brought up actuall evidence against storm, id love to see it. Preferably in a way more compelling than before.
Here!

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ME
  • The aforementioned PM intercepted by myusername.
  • Going after scum in the tribunal
  • Lack of quack
EVIDENCE AGAINST STORM
  • Inn scum pattern
  • 'Innocent' on cop report with me innocent - guaranteed third party
  • Quickly changing the subject of arguments from an argument against his role claim to an argument against him as a player to finally appealing to the town's emotions by begging Digitalmez to hammer, as I 'begged' him to protect me in the inn.
  • WIFOMing about 'more night kills'
 
Top