I never said it was an objective thing. I said it was my argument to lynch notty at the bottom.
You're misunderstanding and you know very well how manipulative it is to say 'why you should vote notty' in big bold underlined letters, provide it with 4 reasons and then 'why you should vote me' in big bold underlined letters and provide it with 1 reason. This is manipulative. Stop pretending it isn't. I don't care that you wrote they were your reasons at the bottom of the post, they make it look as if there is nothing against you and everything against me. You had exactly 0 reason to include 'why you should vote me' in big bold underlined letters if you were just formatting your arguments against me unless you wanted to manipulate people. You had exactly 0 reason to compare arguments against you vs arguments against me (and leaving out plenty vs you) unless you wanted to manipulate people.
why are you avoiding my question?
okay, why?
Excuse me is there a trait/power that is 'you can kill someone once you're sure you want them dead' that takes 2 days? Yes it's exactly the combination of prime/ignite
I'm not avoiding it but it takes more than 1 second to go back and find claires posts again instead I answered the question right in front of me. Give me more than 5 seconds thank you.
Literally CAN YOU GIVE ME MORE THAN 5 SECONDS TO POSt I was gonna talk about Omni aswell but you know what you want a post her ehave an unfinished post above
....because Alpha wanted the vigilante role to take 2 days so they can't instantly kill someone. The power that perfectly describes it is not kill because that kills instantly and doesn't take 2 days.
so you agree that leaving out the fact that oog thinks I'm mafia, when my point is 'oog, me and hip are all convinced you're mafia', is manipulation? you agree that those two things are relevant to each other?I'm not avoiding it but it takes more than 1 second to go back and find claires posts again instead I answered the question right in front of me. Give me more than 5 seconds thank you.
See this screenshot, where claire says you're taking out the parts that support you even though the original post states otherwise. It's exactly what you've done. Arguing that you/hip/Oog know me best and they all think I'm scum therefor I must be scum. But conveniently ignoring that you're scum so this isn't an argument, hip is only lynching me for the prime/ignite thing and has nothing to do how well he knows me, and Oog also thinks you're scum (and is willing to let me prove myself). Arguing you all know me best so I have to be scum is manipulation because it's a faulty argument for reasons
Hmm, perhaps some usefulness but still think it’s more unlikely to be mafia than townie. I don’t feel like jailer is a mafia role and I have never seen it been before either.
You're even lying right now where you say your point is 'oog, me and hip are all convinced you're mafia' while your point actually was 'oog, me and hip all know Notty best and we all think they're Mafia, clearly the people who know Notty best would know if she's acting non-town' (btw you say Mafia here but should be third party or non-town but whatever that was a typo).
notty is probably third party arsonist
my argument is 'all three people who probably know notty best are convinced she's third party'
Whatever Alpha's reasons were we don't know it untill after the game, but I assume to make sure the town can't instantly kill someone and instead have to be more tactical (by dousing the right person the day before) adding another element of skill into the mix.
I think matty will only be a target tonight if notty is alive, because if notty dies the incentive to kill matty is just 'he's a PR' but there are more threatening PRs out there than him to kill first (blockers)
I mean power inspect is way less valuable, like you pointed out earlier, most powers are irrelevant to alignment, meaning mafia can claim their true powers and not get outed by power inspect - which is why you thought using it on omni was pointless right?
