You can't possibly expect us to follow you like that...?
I don't think coolio is really expecting people to follow just based on a hunch vote, instead basically just throwing it out there as a possibility and stating an opinion. Nothing else really.
Although I would say a vote is a bit... much, for a hunch vote. Hunches are good to have, and even help you keep a closer eye on players you may not entirely trust at different stages in the game, but
voting off of one, especially with no reason as to why past simply "the hunch" isn't really helping anyone. :<
I mean, voting a hunch, I'm cool with, as long as you have at least, some reason, even if its kind of small.
Say like, I'm suspicious of X because of what he said in this post Y. Something along those lines at least gives you some merit, and possibly gives people time to look back at said person to see if their truly vote worthy/suspicious, or for rebuttals by players who may disagree with it, and so on, and so on.
So like, I can say I disagree with Swate's "hunch" vote for a variety of different reasons. I can say I'm not a big fan of "hunch lynches" in this regard mainly because its out of nowhere (at least as far as I can see), and if the hunches are basically based off of the arguments being proposed by GmK, ansoro, etc (which seems like the most reasonable assumption, since it is basically the only source for any "suspicion); arguments I don't really see as vote-worthy or seem to be playing to much into aspects I disagree with, like I don't believe lynching off of the reason that "hammering" Fiesta even though he didn't think Fiesta was guilty is reasonable (again, in my opinion). Let's be honest here, Fiesta was probably going to be lynched either way since it seemed like no one was basically going to change their stance on their votes at that point without game changing evidence, and the vast majority had already bandwagon'd onto Fiesta by that point anyways.
The deadline was close anyways. Even though I disagree with lynching Fiesta, it doesn't mean I don't think it wasn't reasonable not to just get that... basically a stalemate of opinions, from ending a day that was essentially already over.
There are other reasons
(Like "overly cutesy personality..." what? How is that even a thing guys), but then I would basically just be rehashing what other people have already said (which I have already done here basically), and I don't really want to waste more time on that subject.
But that's just my opinion out of many others.
I have a few suspicions, but this game, the more I think of these suspicions, the more I convince myself out of them for being overly silly / just looking into random things that actually make no sense to be suspicious about.
I'm normally bad at following myself up on things, so I'm going to try and break that.
I'm still suspicious of basically those that followed the bandwagons of prior or even started those bandwagons, like I said in one of my past posts, like GmK, tim, etc.
One of my biggest suspicions at the moment has to be tim to a degree. There is just something... off, about him.
He's certainly not being as participated as in Masquerade, where he certainly provided some decent analyzed posts and opinions while challenging or agreeing with certain stances or opinions; an aspect I feel he's really been lacking this game, in fact, he's really been "going with the flow" and covering a lot with randomness, more than usual. I view this especially in his vote on Fiesta with no real explanation (right after the deadline post, and Ooglie's vote too if I'm not mistaken). The statement about the arsonist, although I still feel heavily that I was being an idiot in that post, still irks me to a degree, and that random jump on Hype near the beginning of the day...
...
I have a few more suspicions (and maybe expand/explain better ones ive said already) but its like, 6 am, I would like to get at least an hour of sleep, so Ill probably respond again once I wake up and not continually blacking out for a few seconds.