- Status
Votecount - Appearing at last
Infected_alien8_ - Vatumok (1/6)
With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch and 5 to no-lynch
(Taken from first post role list)
Zombie Leader - Wins if zombies have majority
-With other Zombies, chooses one person each night that will be infected OR killed, based on current player/zombie ratio
-A player is NOT notified of when they are infected, but turn into a zombie the following night
Infected_alien8_ - Vatumok (1/6)
With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch and 5 to no-lynch
(Taken from first post role list)
Zombie Leader - Wins if zombies have majority
-With other Zombies, chooses one person each night that will be infected OR killed, based on current player/zombie ratio
-A player is NOT notified of when they are infected, but turn into a zombie the following night
Infected_alien8_
Garry's Mod Admin
I don't see how I'm suspicious, given I've only said about 5 words in this entire game...
I suppose my lack of posts could mount suspicion on me but it's literally 5 words, and those words made up a question.
o.
Onward to actual discussion...
I just read up on recent posts but I'm still not entirely sure what's going on. All I really gleaned from it was that Inf's all-town inn theory was completely wrong (totally didn't see that coming), but apparently we already kinda knew that but nobody noticed?
Which means Inf if trying to make the people in the inns look less suspicious or something? Ok that's probably not true at all and I'm just being a dumb and you can ignore me.
I've just looked through the role list again, and there is something we need to keep in mind: There is a suicide bomber in the mafia. Meaning we need to make the second most suspicious person (assuming the first is being lynched) place the final vote.
One other thing we need to keep in mind is that we might have more going for us against the zombies than we actually think, and they're not so OP after all. What I mean is, we all have information hidden from us about our own roles. Or at least most of us do.
That's all I got for now. Hope this gets some good discussion going.
As has been said, it's nothing you did. It's the position you were dropped into, being a replacement and all. The best way to alleviate it is to be as active as you can manage.
Onward to actual discussion...
I just read up on recent posts but I'm still not entirely sure what's going on. All I really gleaned from it was that Inf's all-town inn theory was completely wrong (totally didn't see that coming), but apparently we already kinda knew that but nobody noticed?
Which means Inf if trying to make the people in the inns look less suspicious or something? Ok that's probably not true at all and I'm just being a dumb and you can ignore me.
I've just looked through the role list again, and there is something we need to keep in mind: There is a suicide bomber in the mafia. Meaning we need to make the second most suspicious person (assuming the first is being lynched) place the final vote.
One other thing we need to keep in mind is that we might have more going for us against the zombies than we actually think, and they're not so OP after all. What I mean is, we all have information hidden from us about our own roles. Or at least most of us do.
What I'm thinking is that we each have some par of our role that we don't know about to help counteract the zombies passively. You know, something that we're doing without even knowing about it to slow down the zombies. For example, maybe the Drunk's roleblock target also becomes immune to infection for a night. Or when the Party Host does the thing, it shuts down night chats. Things like that.
That's all I got for now. Hope this gets some good discussion going.
I think that makes a lot of sense actually.
But who do we lynch in the meantime?
If Inf's theory that everyone in an Inn is town is wrong, that makes me more suspicious of him again.
I personally don't see geek (or her predecessor) as suspicious as it isn't the first time rune has done something like that (inactivity).
Actually that's a good question. I don't remember why i wasn't as suspicious of vat anymore. it might have been your theory idk. Anyway thats why im putting off voting, so i can look back when i have more time and am no longer stressing about my last final.
Looking back on the past day i didn't find where i said i was less suspicious of inf, so i'll have to look back through earlier days. I did see some other stuff though.
His next post said this however. (keep in mind these two sentences aren't actually related)
Anyway BRB looking back through past days.
I saw this and it seems to imply vat isn't zombie leader. Surely zombie leader would understand their own role?
His next post said this however. (keep in mind these two sentences aren't actually related)
Those statements just seem... off to me. Especially the last one. I get a passive aggressive vibe from it.
This still doesn't entirely sit right with me, and inf's response doesn't sit right with me anymore either. Could inf and tim be a mafia team perhaps?
Anyway BRB looking back through past days.
I can't seem to find the post where i said i wasn't as suspicious of inf anymore, so idk. I may not have even said it idk. It was probably because of that everyone in an inn is town theory, which is proven wrong somehow in a way that probably makes sense.
I did see this though. Something to keep in mind.
So who all can we say has been lurking? (besides rune/geek)
I did see this though. Something to keep in mind.
In other news i really hate how the quotes work on forums.
So who all can we say has been lurking? (besides rune/geek)
Infected_alien8_
Garry's Mod Admin
Do you mean less suspicious of vat*?
And no can confirm I'm not mafia with tim, I just didn't see any reason he had to lie about that since it doesn't make him any more/less innocent and if someone else was contacted they could just say so.
Also that statement from vat could be a mindgame to make us think he's not zombie leader. Not that I think he is, but just something to look out for.
And the thing oog said was about when mars worded that weird thing where he said other mafia had been lurking, but to be honest I think he was more saying that in past games mafia had lurked, rather than this game, but I guess it's a lead of some form that we could follow.
Like I said then, but just lost track of what was day and what was night. I often do when it comes to chats.
Besides, what possible reason would I have to say I was ontacted by the detective if I wasn't?
And in the case that I was lying about it, what possible reason would the person who actually would've been contacted have to not say anything?
- Status