The Bloody Masquerade Ball [GAME OVER]
- Thread starter GmK
- Start date
I don't even know how to contribute this game anymore.
I'm going to bed, anyhow... And all I've been noticing while I've been super tired is that Hunter's chat has been the elephant in the room for me... But, that has nothing to do with his role, so...
Night.
I'm going to bed, anyhow... And all I've been noticing while I've been super tired is that Hunter's chat has been the elephant in the room for me... But, that has nothing to do with his role, so...
Night.
Holy shit I've caught up with everything. What the hell is going on...
These are indeed the three members of Voltaris Tribunal.
GmK
International Man Of Cake
VOTECOUNT - The one where JUST VOTE ALREADY OR YOU SHALL BE DEADLINED <3
Prizyms - [fa=fa-user][/fa] - JKangarroo, (Lynch in 8)
myusername22 - [fa=fa-user][/fa] [fa=fa-user][/fa] [fa=fa-user][/fa] [fa=fa-user][/fa] [fa=fa-user][/fa] - storm886, Hunter27a1, digitalmez, timdood3, Ltin (Lynch in 4)
Ltin - [fa=fa-user][/fa] - myusername22 (Lynch in 8)
Not voting:
Mmarz11, Sploorky, Alpha102, Duffie, Ooglie101, Jeercrul (xxxFruitNinjaxXx), 77_is_the_best, Prizyms, Fiestadude, nottykitten
With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch and 9 to no-lynch.
Deadline: None yet.
Notice:
- xXxFruitNinjaxXx will be replaced by @Jeercrul within today at some point
- @Hunter27a1 - whilst I understand what you are doing, I would like to ask you to tone it down a bit, otherwise I'll add a doublepost plugin that automatically joins all your posts to one
JKangaroo
Your Local, Neighborhood Marsupial
I went back and found some things that stuck out to me, but at the moment I'm stuck and don't want to post my idea without a confirmation on somethings that I can't find.
I know we have an idea on some of Old_man_oak's lawyering, such as with tim investigating std night 1 and turning out innocent (Std was Mafia, which means some kind of lawyering went on there)
But besides that, do we have any knowledge of the lawyering done on Night 2, the last night Oak was alive?
Also, I want to confirm again with @Nottykitten that you did claim third-party, yes? I recall you said that before but I just want to make sure.
I've been reading a lot of stuff (cutting into homework time ;-, which I'm going to stop for the time being.
With all these different ideas I've started to have, I might be on to something but with a bunch of the roles being sort of confusing this round it may not entirely be concrete, but I'm going to try and go with it.
I just need some confirmations on some things that I'm unsure about/can't find.
I know we have an idea on some of Old_man_oak's lawyering, such as with tim investigating std night 1 and turning out innocent (Std was Mafia, which means some kind of lawyering went on there)
But besides that, do we have any knowledge of the lawyering done on Night 2, the last night Oak was alive?
Also, I want to confirm again with @Nottykitten that you did claim third-party, yes? I recall you said that before but I just want to make sure.
I've been reading a lot of stuff (cutting into homework time ;-
, which I'm going to stop for the time being.With all these different ideas I've started to have, I might be on to something but with a bunch of the roles being sort of confusing this round it may not entirely be concrete, but I'm going to try and go with it.
I just need some confirmations on some things that I'm unsure about/can't find.
Nottykitten
Nomnomnom kitteh!
(
Sploorky
Member
Im caught. On one hand, I feel that neither priz, notty, and myuser are guilty, but the current situation doesn't make sense, and it might be better to vote for one of them to clear up the confusion we are currently at.
I'd like to address a few things--
(2) I don't think that you, as the message interceptor has the ability to send anyone an offhanded message as easy as that.
Your assumptions make the role sound overpowered and simple. In your experience since when has any role been that effortless? There have always been conditions! I think that your ability to manipulate messages has to coincide with that person's role. Simply changing the message completely would give you the most unfair advantage in the game. Conditions!
To me you've made the most scummiest counter arguments in the game so far. You've basically called us idiots, by simplifying your role's abilities in your hypothetical theories.
If that wasn't bad enough, you've done what Old Man Oak did and brought the focus back to Ltin, when he wasn't even in the spotlight. That tactic looks like an act of desperation rather than a legitimate reason to think he's a threat.
You @myusername22 are NOT town-sided! The moment you role claimed, wasn't to help town, it was for your own benefit. You found out something about Priz and immediately voted for him. With subpar information by the way. Certain votes like that are usually lead by Cops and not side-kick roles that should be more questioning rather than accusatory.
(1) I firmly believe that you do have the ability to change messages, but it's with conditions.
(2) I don't think that you, as the message interceptor has the ability to send anyone an offhanded message as easy as that.
Your assumptions make the role sound overpowered and simple. In your experience since when has any role been that effortless? There have always been conditions! I think that your ability to manipulate messages has to coincide with that person's role. Simply changing the message completely would give you the most unfair advantage in the game. Conditions!
To me you've made the most scummiest counter arguments in the game so far. You've basically called us idiots, by simplifying your role's abilities in your hypothetical theories.
If that wasn't bad enough, you've done what Old Man Oak did and brought the focus back to Ltin, when he wasn't even in the spotlight. That tactic looks like an act of desperation rather than a legitimate reason to think he's a threat.
You @myusername22 are NOT town-sided! The moment you role claimed, wasn't to help town, it was for your own benefit. You found out something about Priz and immediately voted for him. With subpar information by the way. Certain votes like that are usually lead by Cops and not side-kick roles that should be more questioning rather than accusatory.
