In the middle of pondering those questions I changed my mind on who I find the most suspicious, I tried to convey it accurately. Apparently I didn't.Up above you listed your suspicion order as Defiant, Hunter, Jivvi.
Now you claim hunter is most suspicious
Those sound too much like test questions. I'm off from school. No tests pls
He is doing something odd. And we want to know peoples opinion on it. And if people don't think he's doing something odd then they say that in their answer.But his first question automatically implies that Hunter is doing something odd
No, it doesn't really. Atleast not how I see the question. He is simply describing the situation and asking peoples opinion about it. Because -> everyone did seem to think Myuser was defending Alpha alot.And the second question implies that Myusername is totally fine in his actions
If people can't even ask/answer questions anymore then what do you propose we do? Nothing at all...?proos to notty and ltin for missing the point completely
It didn't influence my answer, and I doubt it influenced yours. Only someone that hasn't been paying attention to whats going on at all will get influenced. And that's their own fault for not reading about the events themselves Iguess.I actually have to side with Defiant and Jivvi for this one, a couple of the questions have myuser's opinion directly in them. As opposed to being totally objective.
Say what you want about Myuser's questions, but I changed the biased ones so that they didn't have an assumption in them and I feel like I gave perfectly good answers. Asking questions and answering them is a totally legitimate strategy which has proven useful more than once in my past games, so I think that asking questions and answering them is fine. What myuser did is introduce his own opinion into his questions (I'm willing to believe he did it by accident), and he realized that and we even came up with questions that were basically the same question, only without that opinion already built in them. So I propose that we answer those questions and move on from there.Why are you all still answering the questions when we've established that they're loaded •-•
Again, just eliminate the loaded part and we're totally good.I actually have to side with Defiant and Jivvi for this one, a couple of the questions have myuser's opinion directly in them. As opposed to being totally objective.
as in, statistically more likely to lynch a townieIf we're going to rush, let's atleast take the statistical chance of a lynch.
I don't like hunter. He is always to aggressive. And I think it was alpha that mentioned he had never actually been townsided in a forum game?
We should keep liars alive because they are liars? hahaha noLike I won't lynch Alpha off the basis of his "possible third-party affiliations," because I feel the claim is fake, and thus I feel we don't truly know his affiliations (like practically everyone here), so I wouldn't vote him until we had more information to go off of.
wifom+people would attack notty anyway and in fact are more likely to do so because of me typing this line, and notty would most likely flip out about me "ruining their plan". let's see what his "investigation" is tomorrow assuming he even gets oneAlso, Hunter27a1, if you do believe Notty is bomb or granny, why do you keep announcing it to everyone???
If Notty is bomb/granny, then isn't it in your best interest to perhaps NOT try to out their role?
agreeing with the first line and the part about third party claims being unquestioned, but you're defending someone based on the grounds of not trusting their claimAs far as defending you, I've no clue what you're alignment is and I'm not pretending I think I do. I feel certain you're lying about the alien claim because it's a bit too convenient. That said, it doesn't automatically make you non-town it's like hunter posted above. There's a history of people not even questioning third party claims yet town claims are automatically suspect, I think they are right in that we should be suspicious of your claim, but the reason I've been defending you is because as far as I'm concerned you could be anything which gives you the odds of a random lynch. I'd much rather take out someone who has a higher chance of being mafia than a random lynch.
couldn't give less of a fuckPerhaps I scared him.
sorry, thought that was obviousWell, I still don't like Hunter.
oh look another topic change coming upHunter talks funny. He's also going back and forth between things.
have you seen the other games? I'm usually lynched because of being hard to read, and that screws over the rest of the game. It's practically tradition.In the past, Hunter has been hard to read so people end up letting him get off duing the scummiest stuff. I kind of think he's abusing this now and maybe he just changed his tactic to no lynch suddenly because either he found what he was looking for or because he doesn't want to cause himself to be lynched.
I'd consider town/not town to be more important than alignment. Non-townsided, win condition wise.Do you think it's most likely that Alpha102 is town-sided, mafia-sided, or third party?
bingoor that he couldn't care less about any accusations against him, which would suggest that the accusations are wrong.
Omg Hunter you ruined EVERYTHING how could you do this omg.wifom+people would attack notty anyway and in fact are more likely to do so because of me typing this line, and notty would most likely flip out about me "ruining their plan".
Goodbye, never gonna expect any valid logic from you again. (before Alpha freaks out again, no, I'm not gonna quit, I just overdramatize to emphasize my point )We should keep liars alive because they are liars? hahaha no
But I haven't been PROVEN a liar yet! I'm just a suspect!we used to be 100% LYNCH ALL LIARS and now we're defending people on because we don't trust their claims.
this is what I am referring to.