(1) Except that's not true at all. (1.1) I could easily just lurk and cash in a win with relative ease, (1.1a) like so many other mafia members have. (1.2) There's nothing pulling me towards being active. (1.3) As I've tried to point out, plenty of others are following that sort of path.
(2) You seem to ignore the fact hardly anyone else is making contributions and talking. (2.1) Pretty much everyone else has made pretty low-key and not very well-informed opinions. (2.2) The first time I was brought into suspicion was literally because Infected just felt a very small sort of vibe against me.
(3) I think it's important to point out this kind of behavior, as in the past roleplaying has been a very divisive tactic in these games. It's not a baseless claim and has been very important to note in the past.
(4) Except I have been actively under suspicion throughout this whole day and have been constantly addressing it.
Unlike multiple other users in this game, I have been trying to get my thoughts out to try and facilitate discussion. Yes, I recognize that my opinion shift on Tim seems abrupt to most, but I wanted to state that and announce my feelings, (2.1a) as basic hunches are all that have any weight so early on in the game.
(5) Why the hell would I be putting myself in such a vulnerable position in the first place? Like I said, I have no reason to be here right now. (5.1) I could have sit back and let the town tunnel Inf because of his inn circumstances or whatnot and not even say a word. (5.2) There's no gain from this. (5.2a) I'm trying to get my thoughts out and be useful. (5.3) You're throwing together a vote against me just like that.
Yes, I did advocate for a vote, but not immediately. (5.3a) I think it's important to have some sort of progress on Day 1. If you NL twice in a row, your only hope is that a third-party just so happens to knock off a scum during the night or vice versa.
1) It's not? I'm going to take apart all of the statement in the quoted bit and we'll see how much of it is true. "These are all extremely safe statements to make." Yep. "They do enough to prevent Mars from being labelled as inactive." Also true. "They don't exactly contribute anything to the discussion." Accurate.
1.1) Really? Town can't really win if they're all lurking
1.1a) Ah, I see.... You've just referred to yourself as a mafia member. To me, that on it's own is enough to warrant a vote, but seeing as there's more post here to address, I will do so.
1.2) A town win condition. This kind of goes with the above.
1.3) And? We both know that that will bite them sooner or later. Inactivity is the #1 way to be suspicious.
2) What's relevant about that? Are you saying that you're not suspicious for not contributing because others aren't? That argument doesn't even apply.
2.1) My friend, it's Day One and the cop is dead. No suspicions will be well informed.
2.1a) Weren't you just complaining earlier in your post about how nobody was well informed? And now you're defending yourself by saying there's nothing to go off of? This goes in with 2.2 as well, as you complained that you came under suspicion due to a basic hunch.
2.2) When you were first put under suspicion is in this case irrelevant, but I will say this (though it gives little to no additional credit to the argument): When Infy has a light vibe on someone, he's usually right.
3) No? Let's have a look back through history at the effect of roleplaying in mafia. There was the Masquerade, in which Nitasu roleplayed as an assassin. It later came to light that there was a secondary mafia faction present in the game, flavored as assassins. He was lynched. He was town. His roleplaying played no intentional part in the game, and he did it simply for his own amusement.
Last game, the argument could be made that I was roleplaying (though I wouldn't call it that because*) to make claims to support my fake claim, and it was relevant only because *it had a
direct impact on whether people believed my claim or not.
Now, Faliara is roleplaying because....It's something she likes to do. There is nothing suspicious or noteworthy about it.
4) Constantly under suspicion? Sure. Constantly addressing it? Yes, but it's the
way you're addressing it.
5) Because
1.3.
5.1) No one is really tunneling inf at all, really. I mean, sure he was the most likely candidate for a lynch before you came along and started being all suspicious, but not a single town member would feel good about lynching him just because he was the sole survivor of an inn with two other townies in it. There's no evidence there.
5.2) Isn't there? I don't know what game you're playing, but I'm playing Mafia. And in Mafia, any reasonable argument for or against a lynch on anyone is productive.
5.2a) Me too.
5.3) And I'm expanding on it, just like this. Like I said, any reasonable argument for or against anyone is productive. The phrase "Throwing a vote together" implies that his post was weak and hastily put together, but it wasn't. Looks to be you just put it that way to try to discredit it without addressing anything. [Note: yes, you addressed things elsewhere in the post, but not here.]
5.3a) This marker is just here to point out you believe we need progress. This post is progress, just see
5.2 and
5.3.
All of that said,
Vote Marskid
