I cannot see how someone being fine with a random lynch is going far, while someone pushing for an kill on a certain player the first day is not.
random lynching implies no suspicion, just bloodthirst, while pushing for a lynch generally means the person doing the pushing has at least a suspicion of some sort and probably some kind of evidence to back it up
The AFK could have come back and been beneficial to us at least.
he made exactly zero posts in three days and was tagged at least once in an attempt to get his attention
I'm getting extremely potent scum vibes from him and I want to hear everyone else's views on why he should not be lynched.
funny I've been getting the opposite
this post would look a lot better in full caps and with more exclamation marks dont you think
Aqua
can we like,,, let this die I mean really
But then the mafia will kill someone in the night providing the doctor doesn't block that person which is likely. That means that by day 3 there will be 3 dead townies and 0 dead mafia.
On day one the argument for a lynch was that there would be a high chance of hitting a mafia, so why not do the same now? If anything the odds are even higher as there are already two townies gone. I say we chance our arm and go for a lynch, otherwise it may benefit the mafia.
(yes, I do know that it could turn out that we killed someone at the lynch and if mafia then killed someone during the night that'd leave 4 townies and no mafias dead but does no-one else think that the risk is worth it?)
i'd like to hear other people's views on whether (in general) they would like a lynch or not.
I'm not 100% sure I'm reading this right but well. Yes a townie is already dead, but you're also assuming the worst case scenario in which we lynch another townie, the doctor fails, and the vig hits a townie. All of those happening at once doesn't seem too likely. Possible but not certain. Also, you say
IF the mafia kills--why would they
not?