JK, my main reason for voting for you is this: Even if you are town and unknowingly killing people, lynching you prevents a death, while lynching 77 doesn't necessarily, as he may have more scum buddies that can kill with our without him.
Again, not necessarily, in fact all it does is make the town weaker, and more susceptible to getting overwhelmed by other factions, since we don't know how many are left, and how much damage they can do.
Effectively, If the poisoning is true, without my knowledge of it, then I'm essentially what I was last game: a vigilante that dies if I make the wrong target (last game scum, this time, a player who has potatoes.)
I'm not against the town, and I've played entirely in favour of the town. My only goal is survival right now.
I made a suggestion a little while ago that was, if I target a player (with the advice and consent of the town), whom we
heavily or at least
slightly think it likely to be anti-town, then a visit from me, and
potential poisoning (since I dont know how it works yet, and I doubt we even will if I die since my role still effectively is "Telegram Operator" even if it changed partway through), then 1) you can put pressure on them to get more information, 2) If they are scum, then essentially there's a free kill that can clear up a lynch for people that are likely to be scum to get lynched upon, and 3) If they
dont have a potato bucket, which is my goal each night, then I essentially die. So basically, if you dont trust me,
I'll probably die anyways since I've only tried targeting people who's stories were likely to have that bucket. That's the entire point of my current ability.
Plus, 77 claims to be a busser with a contradictory win condition, as has already been pointed out, and has yet to defend that. Bussing, as we have seen in numerous games, is extremely unpredictable, and dangerous, especially if he is scum, as we heavily believe he is to be, and if he
does have the ability to kill, if Caff's claim is true, then it just gives another round of kills to a player who isn't town friendly, as we have seen multiple times with 77's actions.
I still think you're making a silly mistake on conjecture, rather than actual possibilities.
The thing about this is that the night JK targeted 77, he switched himself with Watermelon. Watermelon proceeded to die that night and couldn't've tell us he was poisoned.
But what about Samlen? We know from his death that he was a potato poisoner prior, and according to Hunter, this seems to be similar, since he was a "potato poisoner" and according to Hunter he's dying by a poisoned potato.
Though we don't really know who Sam targeted, and I doubt we will until the game ends and Priz releases all of the night actions/whatever, but I'm still wondering if anyone else ever got that message, since I feel, like if this were the case, we'd have learned about this days ago because of that.
PS: picked up on any of the hints? No? Did no one care? *sigh*
PPS: maybe next time (like yesterday) could have deadlines 2 days in advance? Deadlines turns inactivity into activity, which is good, but single day deadlines when some players not even see it feels like it doesn't give enough warning time for that activity to start up. Or maybe that's just me since i don't remember 1 day deadlines happening before. x)
