I've said it before, the blue keycard was a one use thing, and I already used it.now with a 'blue keycard' that lets him visits rooms he knows the number of. The keycard bit feels mostly confirmed, though nothing to prove him as town or anti-town.
Sorry, still on holidays, so this will be quick&dirty:
I think that Lee's claim is utter bullcrap somehow. No fool like role would ever ever claim to be one, it just makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. It would only lead to a town being scared of trying to lynch/kill that role (something scum would love to have town think) but goes against any win conditions of such a role, so again: The claim makes no sense.
Combined with the fact of him not dying to the O5s makes me think there is way more in play here, maybe a bulletproof scumster (seeing how we also seem to have a town bulletproof) or a deflecting role. In any case, this is currently my only lead, so:
vote Lee_Scar
Can people suspicious of GmK post a list of reasons? We've done a lot of "(S)He seems guilty to me, better lynch; we haven't got much else to go on" and I'd like to evaluate our choice a LOT more thoroughly this season of mafia and I'd like to make sure we know what we are getting into. The main points I've heard (not saying I haven't missed any) is his room breaking and these two (for the record posted together) tidbits that led to Lee's lynch Day 5. I'm very worried as we seem to be falling into the same old trap.Let me just add: If Lee was a fool like role, he should have simply not claimed since we were already so close to lynching him. This tight there makes the least sense: If the town is bent on lynching you due to not claiming, why claim the one thing that would actually benefit from the town lynching you!?
Like I said, it makes - in my mind - nooo sense.
Just random thought...Ohh yea k. So what about me?
Seems people for got about this. Or ignored it. Either way people voting GmK without addressing it unsettles me.Can people suspicious of GmK post a list of reasons? We've done a lot of "(S)He seems guilty to me, better lynch; we haven't got much else to go on" and I'd like to evaluate our choice a LOT more thoroughly this season of mafia and I'd like to make sure we know what we are getting into. The main points I've heard (not saying I haven't missed any) is his room breaking and these two (for the record posted together) tidbits that led to Lee's lynch Day 5. I'm very worried as we seem to be falling into the same old trap.
With our start of 28 players I was certain yesterday was the end so I think we should be careful before we just foolishly rush into things.
For your convience the reactions to GmK's quotes above can be found on page 99.
First off, ltin claimed survivor. Either you forgot his claim or you're both mafia /shrug.Here is 11 people. That means 5 or less people is mafia.
Since I <Raxo>, Jolteon, you <ltin>, coolio, Tim and Oak are townies, this leaves 5 other people.
Samlen is third party. That leaves 4 people.
Raxo2222
Ltin
Timdood3
Jolteon42
Samlen
GmK
Old_Man_Oak_63
chicken23456789
The road to ruin
Faliara
cooliorules
So it leaves GmK, Chicken, Faliara and theroad.
I don't understand this. We've already had theories about 05 having a mafia infiltrator so that doesn't prove anything. Addtionally Ltin claimed 3rd party same as me, was that some sort of slip? I buy as lens claim but I urge everyone to hold your votes until GmK has a chance to respond. I find razo and loins eagerness to vote without sufficient evidence concerning.Just random thought...
Here is 11 people. That means 5 or less people is mafia.
Since I, Jolteon, you, coolio, Tim and Oak are townies, this leaves 5 other people.
Samlen is third party. That leaves 4 people.
Raxo2222
Ltin
Timdood3
Jolteon42
Samlen
GmK
Old_Man_Oak_63
chicken23456789
The road to ruin
Faliara
cooliorules
So it leaves GmK, Chicken, Faliara and theroad.
so... imma make wild guess and vote theroad to ruin
This especially so.That's my joke. You can't take it.
vote GmK
Why do you care? You claimed mortician didn't you so doesn't that mean anyone dead is good for you?I don't understand this. We've already had theories about 05 having a mafia infiltrator so that doesn't prove anything. Addtionally Ltin claimed 3rd party same as me, was that some sort of slip? I buy as lens claim but I urge everyone to hold your votes until GmK has a chance to respond. I find razo and loins eagerness to vote without sufficient evidence concerning.
This especially so.
Why do I care? As I pointed out earlier consider the amount of mafia dead yesterday could have been the end, so one wrong death today could be even more so. Are you questioning me for evaluating evidence? I do have a vested interest in hunting down actual mafia, more so than random deaths. I find the evidence presented unsatisfactory and noted what I believe to have been a possible slip, whats wrong with pointing it out?Why do you care? You claimed mortician didn't you so doesn't that mean anyone dead is good for you?
While I'll admit that under any other circumstances I would see it as suspicious, being that I am indeed a third party it's not suspicious to me.Why do I care? As I pointed out earlier consider the amount of mafia dead yesterday could have been the end, so one wrong death today could be even more so. Are you questioning me for evaluating evidence? I do have a vested interest in hunting down actual mafia, more so than random deaths. I find the evidence presented unsatisfactory and noted what I believe to have been a possible slip, whats wrong with pointing it out?
I suppose but I have to admit I'm wary to trust that you are third party when it comes to the stance that you can actively want to lynch someone just to end the game as that could be a free pass to just act like mafia without being questioned.While I'll admit that under any other circumstances I would see it as suspicious, being that I am indeed a third party it's not suspicious to me.