So right now, I'm a bit perplexed about our current situation, we have one dead, maybe another wounded? It's hard to tell on this ship, not only that but from that night we haven't even got an identity of the first man dead. So where are we in the grand scheme of things now from where we were yesterday, not very far at all. From what I gather there is a lot of suspicion being placed on Defiant, understandable, I did have a look at his character profile that he linked in his signature. His choice of character for role play does suggest there is a chance he is a mafia role, but then it could also be a passenger role, the alignment of the character in question is in fact questionable and confusing at times
Then again I feel if the case is that Defiant is mafia, its just too easy a bluff to call, I mean it would be a massive risk, one that maybe will payoff? I know Defiant is known for risky tactics but this seems a little extreme, then again he could always be a 3rd party character who knows really.
However after all this I am getting off the main point I wanted to discuss, whether Defiant is good or evil he had a point. After night 1 we are no better off than we were day 0 and we still have no information or relatively little, so today we must lynch someone. The question remains though is who? Now before you go off and say we should all vote for Defiant, I'd like to halt your bandwagon right there. While we received no information about the role of said victim marskid, I've come to the conclusion that either of these options has occurred.
1. Marskid's role revealed no information upon his role on death; if Mars was some kind of suicide role or something like that, its possible that is why we received no information of his possible role.
2. A mafia power was activated to ensure no information was revealed upon the death of the marskid; in such a case I imagine that this power is a one use only. I could be wrong though.
3. A 3rd party power was responsible, see above.
To me it seems quite likely that it was Marskid's role that caused no information to be received but then again it could have been a 3rd party, or even a mafia power.
Of course we have no information on his role so we can only assume what actually might have happened, but right now I'm banking on the possibility it was actually a mafia power, such a stratagem would suit them well on the first night as of now we can only assume and speculate as to what Marskid's role was. Keeping this in mind that means that a No lynch on the First Day would have suited the mafia extremely well as basically we are on Day 1 now and we are in the exact same position we were yesterday. So now you ask what does that have to do with Defiant? Well considering Defiant's aggressiveness yesterday, if this was what the mafia had planned then I don't understand how Defiant is being put under suspicion as a possible mafia member. If what I mentioned before is true and the mafia wanted a No Lynch while Defiant was aggressively voting others, it just doesn't add up. So after reviewing all this I must conclude that it is more likely that Defiant is either a 3rd party role or a passenger, don't ask me about possible power roles he could be, as I haven't a clue of what power roles there are.
Alright so, who I think we should be looking at then, well aside from the quiet ones who quickly pushed the no lynch vote, there are also a few sore thumbs that seem to have arisen when Defiant became aggressive (I'm not actually sure if this is the right word for what he did, I know he was trying to draw out the mafia so I'm just going to call it aggressive anyways) I'd like to start looking at a few people more closely however I feel this post is a bit too long already, I sent way longer presenting my thoughts on Defiant than I meant to
but then I suppose this is what I get for not actively posting. The life of a lazy man is one you will never know.
Eh while im at it that might as well be my character, 'The lazy man' :)
.