so i've caught up the few pages since important stuff was actually said after i shitposted which i didnt expect
notty's claim is ok, i don't really like it though, cause all of what i've read about the tower seems to either explicitly state or imply that the tower is the
embodiment of calamity etc. the exception to this is the
inverted reading, which implies aversion of calamity due to advanced warning, but this is a bit of a flimsy argument cause using inverted card meaning doesn't seem to be a universal standard. plus it also means fear of change and that since you haven't let go and moved on, the devil still has a hold of you (almost direct quote), so it's still not super convincing
also to me at least it a) seems pretty vague and b) i can't really imagine any major game events coming from any roles other than the tower or maybe judgement. plus, with the exception of the aforementioned inverted meaning (which i haven't seen mentioned by anyone else all game about any card, and i'm surprised you haven't presented it as an argument yourself yet), everything seems to imply you're the source of the calamity.
i also still don't believe notty is the kind of player to put herself in this position (outside of iggish's theory: she was trying to jump the gun on being considered inno before a massclaim happened), so i'm really wary of what she's trying to accomplish. i still think her claim was unnecessary and hasn't really helped us much or provided any insight so i disagree with her response about it