The Doomed Cruise - Game [OVER AND OUT ]

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nottykitten

Nomnomnom kitteh!
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
6,021
However I want to say/do two things before I read up with stuff tomorrow.[See I didn't even read your entire post because lazy and not in the mood to read up everything]


also you were very defensive when people said they were suspicious of you and now you haven't even posted in a while.
Yes, I haven't had much time to do stuff because school has me doing some work. Also haven't really been in the mood to say much. But it certainly isnt because I got accused. So that argument shouldn't count. And also I am always defensive.

unfortunately the previous night yielded less than 0 results and we can't afford to just keep doing nothing so i'm going to say we at least make an effort to lynch someone tonight,
So you are actualy admitting now that the No Lynch of yesterday was absolutely nothing. Because that is surely what I understand if you say you Keep doing Nothing. The keep means you did nothing before. And now you are voting me for reasons I don't find good enough. But ohwell, I voted you yesterday for only a hunch so I can't blame you for the vote.

But however my vote stays on Myuser. I'm probabily gonna get lynched today[because clearly im suspicious] but I can still try to throw some ideas and discussion around.

Vote Myusername22
 

myusername22

A username.
Donor
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
858
Reaction score
937
Eman grabs a pint as instructed by the drunk man he can never remember the name of. He takes a sip and begins talking. He tell everyone of great stories from the future and where he came from and nobody believes him though they are all thoroughly amused by his stories.
After 10 minutes of this he passes out on the floor after finishing the beer he was drinking.
 

Nottykitten

Nomnomnom kitteh!
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
6,021
One more post... just one...[Not gonna respond to anything else being said after this one. So you gotta wait sorry]
I just had one more thing I had to point out.

unfortunately the previous night yielded less than 0 results and we can't afford to just keep doing nothing so i'm going to say we at least make an effort to lynch someone tonight.
Your discouraging town influence which by definition is Anti-town
"A No Lynch only help the mafia"
As I pointed out earlier, you said a No Lynch is doing nothing. [How is this good for the town?]
And now you are saying that I am discouraging people to vote a No Lynch. And that it is bad.
Which means... You are saying I am discouraging people to do Nothing.[Since you said a No Lynch is nothing]
And Discouraging someone to do Nothing is practically the same as encouraging someone to do something. [For example: Don't do nothing! And: Do something! They give the same message]

So by the things you said, I have actualy encouraged people to do something instead of doing nothing. Yet you still say that I was doing something bad.

And discouraging town influence, yes, probabily. I am discouraging us[the town] to vote a No Lynch because it only helps the mafia. I am discouraging them because what they wanted to do was Wrong and I didn't want them to screw something up. Which they obviously did seeying as the majority voted for a No Lynch and we have as you said... less than 0 results.

But ofcourse the person who encouraged the townspeople to do something gets voted, so it seems like the town is doing a great job =D!
 

Alisha

Member
Mafia Host
Mafia Mod
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
805
Reaction score
2,829
Nottykitten raises a good point, especially as my pleas to vote someone were also unanswered on Day 0. Considering many people chose no lynch anyway, it makes sense that Notty would go further.

I personally don't like the idea of scare tactics, and would rather arguments be brought up for certain people. It is Nottykitten vs myusername22. I'm going to review a bit more and decide if I want to place a vote or not. (Might take awhile, I'm feeling lazy)
 

myusername22

A username.
Donor
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
858
Reaction score
937
One more post... just one...[Not gonna respond to anything else being said after this one. So you gotta wait sorry]
I just had one more thing I had to point out.



"A No Lynch only help the mafia"
As I pointed out earlier, you said a No Lynch is doing nothing. [How is this good for the town?]
And now you are saying that I am discouraging people to vote a No Lynch. And that it is bad.
Which means... You are saying I am discouraging people to do Nothing.[Since you said a No Lynch is nothing]
And Discouraging someone to do Nothing is practically the same as encouraging someone to do something. [For example: Don't do nothing! And: Do something! They give the same message]

So by the things you said, I have actualy encouraged people to do something instead of doing nothing. Yet you still say that I was doing something bad.

And discouraging town influence, yes, probabily. I am discouraging us[the town] to vote a No Lynch because it only helps the mafia. I am discouraging them because what they wanted to do was Wrong and I didn't want them to screw something up. Which they obviously did seeying as the majority voted for a No Lynch and we have as you said... less than 0 results.

But ofcourse the person who encouraged the townspeople to do something gets voted, so it seems like the town is doing a great job =D!

No the point behind my argument is that you were discouraging the towns people from voting or talking about no lynch by threatening to make a vote on anyone who doesn't exactly agree with you. Town discussion / voting is all the town really has as a weapon against the mafia without it we are useless

I'd also like to point out that if someone doesn't vote something out of fear of accusations against them their just going to just magically happily vote for your ideas. Instead they will stop sharing their opinions and simply not put any votes forward.

"Silence only helps the mafia"

You'll notice there were a few pages between where you threatened the no lynchers and where I voted and then you'll notice after I voted no lynch others became less afraid and actually voted it as well

Voting no lynch was an attempt to prevent a mis lynch because we were operating on little information
In no way is this doing nothing , the people who failed to vote were the ones doing nothing and as I've stated you discouraged people from voting therefore weakening the towns only weapon.

To clarify something:

I do not regret voting no lynch on day 0 we the town are forced to act in what we believe to be the best interest of the town at any point. No lynching was a bit of a gamble that turned up short however it looked like the best option so we had to vote to no lynch at that point even if it was possible we might not get much information in return
 

HypeBurst

Just Fabulous
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
450
Reaction score
1,165
I was really close to voting for Notty when I saw User's posts about manipulating the vote and such, but I stopped when I saw this post.

One more post... just one...[Not gonna respond to anything else being said after this one. So you gotta wait sorry]
I just had one more thing I had to point out.

unfortunately the previous night yielded less than 0 results and we can't afford to just keep doing nothing so i'm going to say we at least make an effort to lynch someone tonight.
Your discouraging town influence which by definition is Anti-town
"A No Lynch only help the mafia"
As I pointed out earlier, you said a No Lynch is doing nothing. [How is this good for the town?]
And now you are saying that I am discouraging people to vote a No Lynch. And that it is bad.
Which means... You are saying I am discouraging people to do Nothing.[Since you said a No Lynch is nothing]
And Discouraging someone to do Nothing is practically the same as encouraging someone to do something. [For example: Don't do nothing! And: Do something! They give the same message]

So by the things you said, I have actualy encouraged people to do something instead of doing nothing. Yet you still say that I was doing something bad.

And discouraging town influence, yes, probabily. I am discouraging us[the town] to vote a No Lynch because it only helps the mafia. I am discouraging them because what they wanted to do was Wrong and I didn't want them to screw something up. Which they obviously did seeying as the majority voted for a No Lynch and we have as you said... less than 0 results.

But ofcourse the person who encouraged the townspeople to do something gets voted, so it seems like the town is doing a great job =D!
Now I've changed my mind.

vote myusername22
 

Prizyms

あんたバカァ~!?
Mafia Host
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
2,899
After reading the above, it seems almost clear that myusername22 is either incredibly confused as to his intentions or he has done something horribly, horribly wrong. As far as I'm concerned, I have suspicions on Defiant_Blob due to the concerns raised above, plus myusername22 for his various escapades. I'm not going to vote for now but I will do promptly after reading some more of the thread and deciding who should be thrown overboard.

We really ought to work as a 'unit' and start working together in order to find who's been particularly scummy as it were. Defiant already catches my eye as someone who could be a threat, but for all we know there's a chance there could be a fool in this game and he's trying to get lynched ._.

Regardless, I'm going to head off for tonight - see you in the morning
 

Omar_Sales

Squid
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
256
Reaction score
837
Ok so, apart from the current suspicions that we're dealing with, I have a bigger one. (This doesn't mean I'm not suspicious of myuser, notty and defiant atm, but I feel this one deserves more attention)
It's someone who hasn't been inactive, but he's managed to stay out of suspicion.
Until now that is.
Ladies and gentlemen, that person is Shinyshark

Now the reason I'm suspecting of him is:
He hasn't actually helped in discussions, all he's done is post his roleplay yet he immediately jumped on the no lynch bandwagon the first night under the excuse "We can't lynch anyone without any murder yet". Which is a horrible idea unless you're a mafia, where a no lynch would just take take off the extra risk of him getting lynched (or another mafia).

Another reason I have is his last post, he said he'll be damned if he didn't at least try to find out who the killer was.
That'd make sense if it wasn't for the fact he hasn't actually posted anything valuable to the discussion and this seems hypocritical to me. Another trait of a mafia.

I feel he's been posting just for the sake of posting and not be suspected for being inactive.
 

Vino

Fidget Spinner
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
382
Reaction score
741
Well i can see that we all have our minds set on lynching someone for this next night. If we all disagree on who to lynch then nothing will get done. Lets try to get a list of all our suspects and then lets pick the most suspicious of them.

I guess i may have been a little "Trigger Happy" on starting the train against defiant. As much as i feel he should be our target for the day, im gonna have to withdraw my vote. I would rather us work as a team to lynch someone then to constantly point the finger at each other, so for now...

Unvote
 

cooliorules

That Awkward Noodle
Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
1,512
Reaction score
2,478
After reading all this, I'm at a tie between Defiant (it's a hunch, okay?!), Notty and a -little- bit Shiny.

Defiant was at fist a major suspect, but that's been slithered down, to just a hunch, maybe a bit more.

I know what myuser is like out of game, so I know how he acts/talks. If he is mafia, I'm going to look so guilty, but because of this I feel that Notty is the anti-town out of myuser and Notty.
(For all we know, they might both be town)

Shiny, yeah, I agree with Omar! posts for the sake of posting to not seem suspicious. But he does seem suspicious to me.

Anyway, I'm gonna think about it and then post my most suspicious with a vote.
 

Oak Milk

Kill Hungry Thirsty Dead
Mafia Host
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
1,267
Reaction score
1,922
Yeahrs, Shinny ain' nevah' poshted anythun' o' valyew, so....

tha' brin's mah sushpishuns ta Nawhty, Mahusha, Vrishka, an' ShinnyShawhk.

Translation: Yeah, shiny hasn't posted anything of value, so... that brings my suspicions to Notty, Myuser, Defiant, and Shiny.
Aren't you at about the same level, you've contributed basically nothing to this discussion as well, the RP is nice but seriously you haven't given an in depth post as to your own thoughts. Unless I've missed that particular post, in which case link me plox
 

K1ngHoward

SMP Vetop
Donor
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
395
Reaction score
380
Another person we can add to the "suspect list" is Ansoro. He was one of the early No Lynch voters which doesn't seem strange other than he did not list his reasons at all. He just voted "No Lynch" on page 4 and went on his merry way with not a peep out of him until today which was mostly roleplay which doesn't add anything to the discussion. Maybe he just didn't have anything to add when he voted "No Lynch", but he could of at least added something else than just voting and walking out.
 

Ansoro2112

Hottie
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
3,405
Reaction score
4,133
Another person we can add to the "suspect list" is Ansoro. He was one of the early No Lynch voters which doesn't seem strange other than he did not list his reasons at all. He just voted "No Lynch" on page 4 and went on his merry way with not a peep out of him until today which was mostly roleplay which doesn't add anything to the discussion. Maybe he just didn't have anything to add when he voted "No Lynch", but he could of at least added something else than just voting and walking out.

I voted "No Lynch" simply because I had no information at all at the beginning. I'm not going to go around pointing fingers at people if I don't have enough information to support my reason.

And I'm only roleplaying as for right now because I'm still reading and gathering information about what others are saying. Then when I feel more comfortable about what I've gathered I'll give my two cents. Its just not my style to jump into accusations right off the bat.
 

Sploorky

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
1,890
Reaction score
3,656
Alright, so.

My suspicions still largely rest on defiant. Not because of your votes, but your playstyle. Like I said, you're using your skills and experience as a shield. Nobody wants to vote for you, because you respond with such aggression and assertiveness that they don't follow through. You're roughly invincible to lynches, because you know people aren't going to follow through if you respond with the aggression you play with.

Nitasu, you seem to only have suspicions on those who are brought up.
Translation: Right now I'm at 2 Options: Notty/Defiant. I want some influence to see who I'll vote for (cuz I'm at a tie between them.)
And then when people throw suspicion on myuser and shiny:
Translation: Yeah, shiny hasn't posted anything of value, so... that brings my suspicions to Notty, Myuser, Defiant, and Shiny.
Nottty and myuser fly under the radar for me in terms of suspicion, so I have nothing real to note for either of them.
 

Defiant_Blob

( ̄^ ̄)ゞ
Donor
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
2,631
Reaction score
2,051
Alright, so.

My suspicions still largely rest on defiant. Not because of your votes, but your playstyle. Like I said, you're using your skills and experience as a shield. Nobody wants to vote for you, because you respond with such aggression and assertiveness that they don't follow through. You're roughly invincible to lynches, because you know people aren't going to follow through if you respond with the aggression you play with.
((actually I haven't really brought up my experience or skills at all, and it's kind of annoying when others bring it up. I don't like people following me just for my experience or playing against me a certain way just because they think I'm experienced. I'd rather be on a blank slate each time. Mostly because forum mafia I tend to be more unorthodox with my methods since I play forum-mafia for fun. The aggression just comes with the character I chose. Had I chosen someone another character (e.g. Tavros) I'd be much more unconfident in my votes and such. I'm roleplaying, words, actions, votes, and all. I'm not saying this defends myself based on roleplay but I'd like people to appreciate that I'm not my usual self but rather a fictional character.))
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top