Yes, I haven't had much time to do stuff because school has me doing some work. Also haven't really been in the mood to say much. But it certainly isnt because I got accused. So that argument shouldn't count. And also I am always defensive.also you were very defensive when people said they were suspicious of you and now you haven't even posted in a while.
So you are actualy admitting now that the No Lynch of yesterday was absolutely nothing. Because that is surely what I understand if you say you Keep doing Nothing. The keep means you did nothing before. And now you are voting me for reasons I don't find good enough. But ohwell, I voted you yesterday for only a hunch so I can't blame you for the vote.unfortunately the previous night yielded less than 0 results and we can't afford to just keep doing nothing so i'm going to say we at least make an effort to lynch someone tonight,
unfortunately the previous night yielded less than 0 results and we can't afford to just keep doing nothing so i'm going to say we at least make an effort to lynch someone tonight.
"A No Lynch only help the mafia"Your discouraging town influence which by definition is Anti-town
One more post... just one...[Not gonna respond to anything else being said after this one. So you gotta wait sorry]
I just had one more thing I had to point out.
"A No Lynch only help the mafia"
As I pointed out earlier, you said a No Lynch is doing nothing. [How is this good for the town?]
And now you are saying that I am discouraging people to vote a No Lynch. And that it is bad.
Which means... You are saying I am discouraging people to do Nothing.[Since you said a No Lynch is nothing]
And Discouraging someone to do Nothing is practically the same as encouraging someone to do something. [For example: Don't do nothing! And: Do something! They give the same message]
So by the things you said, I have actualy encouraged people to do something instead of doing nothing. Yet you still say that I was doing something bad.
And discouraging town influence, yes, probabily. I am discouraging us[the town] to vote a No Lynch because it only helps the mafia. I am discouraging them because what they wanted to do was Wrong and I didn't want them to screw something up. Which they obviously did seeying as the majority voted for a No Lynch and we have as you said... less than 0 results.
But ofcourse the person who encouraged the townspeople to do something gets voted, so it seems like the town is doing a great job =D!
Now I've changed my mind.One more post... just one...[Not gonna respond to anything else being said after this one. So you gotta wait sorry]
I just had one more thing I had to point out.
unfortunately the previous night yielded less than 0 results and we can't afford to just keep doing nothing so i'm going to say we at least make an effort to lynch someone tonight."A No Lynch only help the mafia"Your discouraging town influence which by definition is Anti-town
As I pointed out earlier, you said a No Lynch is doing nothing. [How is this good for the town?]
And now you are saying that I am discouraging people to vote a No Lynch. And that it is bad.
Which means... You are saying I am discouraging people to do Nothing.[Since you said a No Lynch is nothing]
And Discouraging someone to do Nothing is practically the same as encouraging someone to do something. [For example: Don't do nothing! And: Do something! They give the same message]
So by the things you said, I have actualy encouraged people to do something instead of doing nothing. Yet you still say that I was doing something bad.
And discouraging town influence, yes, probabily. I am discouraging us[the town] to vote a No Lynch because it only helps the mafia. I am discouraging them because what they wanted to do was Wrong and I didn't want them to screw something up. Which they obviously did seeying as the majority voted for a No Lynch and we have as you said... less than 0 results.
But ofcourse the person who encouraged the townspeople to do something gets voted, so it seems like the town is doing a great job =D!
Aren't you at about the same level, you've contributed basically nothing to this discussion as well, the RP is nice but seriously you haven't given an in depth post as to your own thoughts. Unless I've missed that particular post, in which case link me ploxYeahrs, Shinny ain' nevah' poshted anythun' o' valyew, so....
tha' brin's mah sushpishuns ta Nawhty, Mahusha, Vrishka, an' ShinnyShawhk.
Translation: Yeah, shiny hasn't posted anything of value, so... that brings my suspicions to Notty, Myuser, Defiant, and Shiny.
Another person we can add to the "suspect list" is Ansoro. He was one of the early No Lynch voters which doesn't seem strange other than he did not list his reasons at all. He just voted "No Lynch" on page 4 and went on his merry way with not a peep out of him until today which was mostly roleplay which doesn't add anything to the discussion. Maybe he just didn't have anything to add when he voted "No Lynch", but he could of at least added something else than just voting and walking out.
Hi <3 Sorry, busy with school and homework and stuff. So um the first night didn't really work out, did it? ^.^ I'd say lynch someone definitely, but I have no idea who.And it would be fantastic to hear from hihihilolHI <3
And then when people throw suspicion on myuser and shiny:Translation: Right now I'm at 2 Options: Notty/Defiant. I want some influence to see who I'll vote for (cuz I'm at a tie between them.)
Nottty and myuser fly under the radar for me in terms of suspicion, so I have nothing real to note for either of them.Translation: Yeah, shiny hasn't posted anything of value, so... that brings my suspicions to Notty, Myuser, Defiant, and Shiny.
((actually I haven't really brought up my experience or skills at all, and it's kind of annoying when others bring it up. I don't like people following me just for my experience or playing against me a certain way just because they think I'm experienced. I'd rather be on a blank slate each time. Mostly because forum mafia I tend to be more unorthodox with my methods since I play forum-mafia for fun. The aggression just comes with the character I chose. Had I chosen someone another character (e.g. Tavros) I'd be much more unconfident in my votes and such. I'm roleplaying, words, actions, votes, and all. I'm not saying this defends myself based on roleplay but I'd like people to appreciate that I'm not my usual self but rather a fictional character.))Alright, so.
My suspicions still largely rest on defiant. Not because of your votes, but your playstyle. Like I said, you're using your skills and experience as a shield. Nobody wants to vote for you, because you respond with such aggression and assertiveness that they don't follow through. You're roughly invincible to lynches, because you know people aren't going to follow through if you respond with the aggression you play with.