Fiestaguy
The man with 8 fingers.
I was actually planning on posting a question there 0.0 didn't post the entire message i guess.No need for another tag, I already did that.
Swate. Care to explain this slip-up?
I was actually planning on posting a question there 0.0 didn't post the entire message i guess.No need for another tag, I already did that.
Let's just add: If you do not have an item state 'I do not have an item' to make it clearActually it would be helpful to know if any items are in play at all. Since this is a very role-specific setup, I have my doubts. Regardless~
If you have any sort of item, state 'I have an item.'
Please note that you will quite likely be exposing yourself by doing this. If you are a vital role, or your item is a not a vest or a similar self-protective item, it may be best not to claim.
I don't have an item, but don't push it out of people. We don't want some important role outing with some halfdecent item and getting killed just for having the item.Let's just add: If you do not have an item state 'I do not have an item' to make it clear
Let's just say ONLY say you have an item if you have Received it. disclosing What item you have is your choice.
I do not have an item
@Jivvi. For the record. Care to state one of the two? :3
Which, I believe, was the reasoning behind GmK and Notty's votes on him yesterday.Also, Fiesta, you are either being massively careless with your actions as of now, or you're trying to undermine the town. I suppose as this is the exact same thing you did last game, there's no big change here. Try to be careful with how you handle things, your logic thus far has been as watertight as a sieve.
That is why i'm saying. It is for your own decision to say how good the item is.I don't have an item, but don't push it out of people. We don't want some important role outing with some halfdecent item and getting killed just for having the item.
Maybe include the rest of my post.
Please note that you will quite likely be exposing yourself by claiming to have an item If you are a vital role, or your item is a not a vest or a similar self-protective item, it may be best not to claim.
I, myself, do not possess any items.
That is exactly why im saying it's their own choice to disclose :3Which, I believe, was the reasoning behind GmK and Notty's votes on him yesterday.
Or if you have used it and gotten something useful for the town out of it, but otherwise, there really isn't much reason to claim either a role or an item.I'm not telling and I hope others do the same. Unless you're about to get lynched, there is absolutely no reason to claim a role or an item, because it only gives the mafia a better idea who to kill during the night.
This is even worse. Not only will said person be showing that they have an item, they will be blatantly stating that it's something fairly decent that they wouldn't want mafia to know about.That is why i'm saying. It is for your own decision to say how good the item is.
So please say if you have an item or not. You can say
I have an item
I do not have an item
I wish not to disclose
I just went through this."I do not wish to disclose" sounds more like someone has an item but isn't exactly stating it explicitly. This is kind of a giveaway and a silly idea. In most situations I have observed the items given out are probably better kept as a secret than revealed to everyone.
Sorry >.<I just went through this.
Fiesta, you are being utterly dense. Can you please, please think over your posts before you post them, especially fi you're trying to expose things like this.
My original idea was that if one or two people claimed with a fairly basic item such as a vest, it might reveal if the setup was heavily based around items. Fiesta, here, however, has blown it out of proportion and gone on an item hunt, wishing to reveal all items, which is a futile and dangerous prospect.In most situations I have observed the items given out are probably better kept as a secret than revealed to everyone.
Woah wait. An 'Item hunt wishing to reveal all items?' I meant it the same as your plan. I guess i must've misinterpreted/miswritten something >.<My original idea was that if one or two people claimed with a fairly basic item such as a vest, it might reveal if the setup was heavily based around items. Fiesta, here, however, has blown it out of proportion and gone on an item hunt, wishing to reveal all items, which is a futile and dangerous prospect.
The way you had it, it would have been blatantly outlined who had what kind of item. Due to the foreshadowing of the setup, however, I highly doubt that items will be a major feature.Woah wait. An 'Item hunt wishing to reveal all items?' I meant it the same as your plan. I guess i must've misinterpreted/miswritten something >.<
I think that sayingThe way you had it, it would have been blatantly outlined who had what kind of item. Due to the foreshadowing of the setup, however, I highly doubt that items will be a major feature.
Except that this is entirely different to how you worded it.I think that saying
It is your own decision if you want to disclose What item you posess
Was enough indication it's their own risk and responsibility >.<
That means i DID miswrite it apparently.Except that this is entirely different to how you worded it.
I think that this topic needs to be dismissed, as the prospect is unlikely and the concept has turned into a complete sludgebucket of an idea.
[article=Old_Man_Oak_63 -2014]I'm fully aware that the pirates don't know who each other is, my vote was more an incentive to be assured a response from Timdood. It was also a device to open up discussion so that people aren't inclined to no-lynch straight off. We have time, lets use it.[/article]Now! To bring up some actual evidence, I recall a mention of Oak slipping up on Day 0 in terms of mafia conversation mechanics. I don't recall seeing the actual post, but it's about the only lead we have.
It doesn't really seem like a slip-up as much as a joke
._.
What we do not need is a repeat of Day 0. Solid evidence would be great, thanks.
Lol.Now! To bring up some actual evidence, I recall a mention of Oak slipping up on Day 0 in terms of mafia conversation mechanics. I don't recall seeing the actual post, but it's about the only lead we have.
Wait. Swate has to justify the slipup yet doesn't he?Lol.
Honestly, the possible slip that Swate has presented us with looks more of a slip to me, in addition to Swate's shifty behaviour in general.