Iggish - I first noticed a voting pattern where he and ender seemed to vote for the same person first day thrice. However, Iggish was the one who followed Ender each time. I have also seen some other have voted for the same sometimes but I will come to that. I first thought you two could be teaming, but since the mulb lynch got decreased suspecions around Ender. Because Ender is a very influential person you could have been backing him up, and using the same reasons as him or others, keeping yourself safe.
The voting was just a coincidence. You say that after the mulb lynch, your suspicion of ender died down. Well since mulb didn't get lynched, I'll assume that you are talking about the aqua lynch. If anything, your suspicions of ender should've increased after that. After all, despite what he says, it is evident that they were backing each other up. Whether this means that he is mafia or not, it doesn't matter, you shouldn't just overlook it.
Ender - I do believe the mafias are trying to make you look like a mafia. Aqau was trying to make it look like you were buddying up with you. I also believe that Mulbs vote for Aqua, was an attempt to make it look like you were a mafia, and then getting you lynched.
I mean, do you only think that he was being framed because he said it? It was a two-way buddying system, not only aqua.
(Ok, back to me again)
I also feel like some of your theories are very weak, and something you quick have made up to create suspicions around certain people (like Ender and Infected).
What? What have I made up? Yes, I have accused people but I have hardly lied as to lie, you have to know the facts and in this game you don't know the facts. Ender attacked me for no reason so I attacked him back. My reason was that him and aqua seemed to be buddying up? How is that making stuff up?
I have hardly "made up" material on infected either. I have just voiced my feelings.
Also, just to note that in these quotes he appears to be defending
ender and
infected.
Also also, unu saying that I might have been voting at the same time as ender to back him up seems to be something he is doing atm. He believes that ender was framed in buddying up with someone (skeptical) and that my theories against ender and inf were some that I "made up".
Weak did not include a response to your points, which I do find very poorly done by him. However, I did find your response weak. I do not see how weak defending Infected could make Infected a "head mafia", and did not see how anything Weak has said made him trying to bring attention away from both Infected and himself. He is doing the opposite, especially with his "we lynch inf, then igg" idea.
Sure, say that I am defending him, but I do find it interesting that you are trying to make him more suspicious, stating he had no good points and just town-read Infected, and asking questions which he just answered in his paragraph if you were paying attention.
First of all, I thought there were head mafia, there aren't, so me making that point ofcourse makes it weak. In my opinion, weak has been trying to bring attention away from inf but did not succeed, (Remember his blatant defence of inf). Weak has also made "very weak" points. Also, I have been going after TWG since day 1, so it's hardly a new strategy, trying to put suspicion on him. Also how is it interesting that I'm trying to make him look suspicious? That's what everyone does to get someone lynched. Hey, that's what
you're doing right now to get
me lynched.
Also, TWG never properly responded to my initial accusations which you yourself say is scummy but then you also say that he responded to my questions, what?
Also, you can say that I'm shifting suspicion onto you, but I wasn't even suspicious of you until you started defending a person who was acting really scummy. And yes, you can say that I'm shifting suspicion to you because I don't want to be lynched (naturally enough), but I don't know how people can just disregard how
inf,
weak and
unu seem to be defending each other.