explain misguidedOog: hard-tunneled on Inf; frustration seems genuine, but the fixation leads to dismissing Inf outright or not really providing answers; Inf withholding the claim is sus, but the push outside of that relies on reasoning that doesn’t hold up imo; leaning misguided town/possible 3P
Same question I asked Inf: Is there a world where you can see me initial role claim as being town? If so, explain.Stranger: was confirmed 3P, but it was all a bait? @Stranger from Planet 9 what does this prove, if anything? Lean scum, don’t see town motivation.
why does tim dying exonerate inf im confusedExcept I don't buy the Inf angle. Misguided as in it hinges on Inf orchestrating a Tim kill, which was apparently a guarantee when it wasn't; he also scumreads you and Notty, w/a Notty sr not really being controversial given their style. The claim withholding doesn't have a good counter, and the stabs at reads are more in Inf's town wheelhouse.
Regardless of a Notty = town world, you're never a guaranteed tr by association. Could easily be pocketing/having a different reason to be invested in keeping Notty alive.
since people are badIf you are 100% on the dot here, why is there no support?
one other messenger so far unless youre claiming a second one?So there are apparently two inn-makers/chat-makers and two other messengers. The fuck is this.
what does this mean?The logic re: Inf not nk-ing Oog is a tale-as-old-as-time in the storybook of WIFOM. A top sus can kill the top sus-er and slip out of it w/enough guile, which scum!Inf has. Oog isn’t a locked mislynch, meaning maf is always forced into an nk attempt. In this case I’d expect to see a bus tbh.
no, thats not me jumping to conclusions at all, its irrelevant if thats your only ability or not and i wasnt summing up your abilities as just 'blocker'. the point is you can block, so can oog, having both of you as town seems unlikely. i didnt need to mention your other ability to say thatOk, but blocking is not my only ability. Summing up my night ability as a "blocker" is the same issue with jumping to conclusions that I expressed earlier.
just because its benign and comes with an excuse not to use a night action if shes mafia, why does that possibility seem more likely to you than just the possibility that shes genuinely a 1-shot blocker?Because overall it's a pretty benign claim overall, especially given that she was claiming to have an ability someone already had. Plus, it gives her an excuse not to use a night action without claiming a VT role.
Yes, b/c I don't buy Skel is town. Games here are role madness and having two inns is crazy, but not out of the realm of possibilities.Same question I asked Inf: Is there a world where you can see me initial role claim as being town? If so, explain.
Tim dying doesn't exonerate scum!Inf or indicate town!Inf. It's not a good basis either way.why does tim dying exonerate inf im confused
also inf doesnt scumread me anymore
and ya but misguided means that im wrong about stuff (in my head atleast) so calling me a misguided town but us both sharing the same opinion on notty seems contradictory to me!
but then why is inf orchestrating tim's death relevant to my read on inf being mafia at allTim dying doesn't exonerate scum!Inf or indicate town!Inf. It's not a good basis either way.
Town can share reads and can disagree on reads. Doesn't inherently = scum/town
Ali can broadcast, and hip can make/intercept messages; depending on how you read hip's claim there's another messenger that sent the original numbers message, so about 2.5 messenger/fence roles.one other messenger so far unless youre claiming a second one?
If scum!Inf is confirmed by night actions & previous day behavior (i.e. Tim dying, Notty sr), I'd expect to see a bussing attempt. None to speak of atm.what does this mean?
Outside of vibes it seemed a Tim kill supported Inf = scum. A lot of other posts I sorted through tbh were an assortment of stating something was wrong w/o elaborating. In which case I'd like elaboration.but then why is inf orchestrating tim's death relevant to my read on inf being mafia at all
If you are wrong about your major push, you are inherently misguided. Idk what other term you'd prefer.and yes but (assuming you meant misguided in the incorrect sense) calling me misguided would mean notty isnt town which would mean youre wrong/misguided too
unless you mean im just wrong about the inf thing (which im not) but in that case i wouldnt sum up my entire existence to be a misguided town since im only wrong on one thing from your pov!
ohhhhhhhhhhhhh right that was that super early point i made about the dislike rating thing and inf using that as motive to pin it on meOutside of vibes it seemed a Tim kill supported Inf = scum. A lot of other posts I sorted through tbh were an assortment of stating something was wrong w/o elaborating. In which case I'd like elaboration.
but im not wrong about it!!!!!If you are wrong about your major push, you are inherently misguided. Idk what other term you'd prefer.
Its not the fact that she's claimed that makes her benign. It's the fact that a person with a single shot ability (especially a non lethal one) isnt going to have nearly as significant impact on the game as someone who can use their ability every night.and how does claiming a role someone already claimed = benign?
Yes it is. You assumed that someone with an ability was scum just because more than one person claimed to have that ability., thats not me jumping to conclusions at all, its irrelevant if thats your only ability or not and i wasnt summing up your abilities as just 'blocker'. the point is you can block, so can oog, having both of you as town seems unlikely. i didnt need to mention your other ability to say that
Actually making my role sound fucking believable to the people who tend to either assume that having two people with any ability automatically means that one is scum.My original question still stands: what does this accomplish from a town POV?
what does this mean?Ali: seems to be making genuine solves and I buy the frame-up angle; behavior has been off but I could be being too harsh in context of D0; town
why does it suddenly make sense?Boo: conflict w/Notty’s role is noted, but an investigative role w/o a cc is never a good lynch choice; not believing Stranger makes sense in this new context, lean town
why is he considering notty town in this scenario im confusedespecially when youre considering notty town in this scenario!
could you explain this post in a different way pleaseExcept I don't buy the Inf angle. Misguided as in it hinges on Inf orchestrating a Tim kill, which was apparently a guarantee when it wasn't; he also scumreads you and Notty, w/a Notty sr not really being controversial given their style. The claim withholding doesn't have a good counter, and the stabs at reads are more in Inf's town wheelhouse.
Regardless of a Notty = town world, you're never a guaranteed tr by association. Could easily be pocketing/having a different reason to be invested in keeping Notty alive.
why would i be confirmed scum though and what does that have to do with whether or not i would kill oog, im confusedIf scum!Inf is confirmed by night actions & previous day behavior (i.e. Tim dying, Notty sr), I'd expect to see a bussing attempt. None to speak of atm.
except it isnt, i didnt "assume" anything, i said it seemed likely to meYes it is. You assumed that someone with an ability was scum just because more than one person claimed to have that ability.
i took misguided to apply to all of my reads when he just meant my read on you so i was confused as to why in the scenario where im a misguided town am i being called misguided when we share the same townread on notty!why is he considering notty town in this scenario im confused
also i wouldnt do this and have in fact been trying to do the exact opposite to get you to read me properlysay that inf was intentionally acting scummy as to discredit my 100% accurate reads on him for future games where hes mafia
Middle of the pgs 70-80 they read more frantic to me b/c of seeing a frame-up job from hip. Complaining about being seen as panicking also pinged me since it was hypocritical in context of D0.what does this mean?
It was a fake claim after all. Ergo someone having doubts makes sense.why does it suddenly make sense?
What's up with it?could you explain this post in a different way please
You're not confirmed scum. That is the point.why would i be confirmed scum though and what does that have to do with whether or not i would kill oog, im confused
ah so youve been ACTING as town huhalso i wouldnt do this and have in fact been trying to do the exact opposite to get you to read me properly
tbh that's not an assumption without merit. How does a 3P claim make you more believable? Why not just commit to your role and arguing through it; the fake doesn't accomplish anything imo.Actually making my role sound fucking believable to the people who tend to either assume that having two people with any ability automatically means that one is scum.
alsoIts not the fact that she's claimed that makes her benign. It's the fact that a person with a single shot ability (especially a non lethal one) isnt going to have nearly as significant impact on the game as someone who can use their ability every night.
this seems to say you think its benign in part because shes claiming a role someone already had so im confused?Because overall it's a pretty benign claim overall, especially given that she was claiming to have an ability someone already had. Plus, it gives her an excuse not to use a night action without claiming a VT role.